Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 22 Oct 2018 11:32:26 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To:     Daniel Wang <wonderfly@google.com>
Cc:     sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, byungchul.park@lge.com,
        dave.hansen@intel.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, jack@suse.cz,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, mhocko@kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz,
        penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, peterz@infradead.org,
        tj@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
        Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>
Subject: Re: 4.14 backport request for dbdda842fe96f: "printk: Add console
 owner and waiter logic to load balance console writes"
Message-ID: <20181022093226.nn5h7ohuzcyeezyt@pathway.suse.cz>
References: <CAJmjG2-RrG5XKeW1-+rN3C=F6bZ-L3=YKhCiQ_muENDTzm_Ofg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181002212327.7aab0b79@vmware.local.home>
 <20181003091400.rgdjpjeaoinnrysx@pathway.suse.cz>
 <CAJmjG2_4JFA=qL-d2Pb9umUEcPt9h13w-g40JQMbdKsZTRSZww@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181003133704.43a58cf5@gandalf.local.home>
 <CAJmjG291w2ZPRiAevSzxGNcuR6vTuqyk6z4SG3xRsbaQh5U3zQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181004074442.GA12879@jagdpanzerIV>
 <20181004083609.kcziz2ynwi2w7lcm@pathway.suse.cz>
 <20181004085515.GC12879@jagdpanzerIV>
 <CAJmjG2-e6f6p=pE5uDECMc=W=81SYyGCmoabrC1ePXwL5DFdSw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJmjG2-e6f6p=pE5uDECMc=W=81SYyGCmoabrC1ePXwL5DFdSw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170421 (1.8.2)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sun 2018-10-21 11:09:22, Daniel Wang wrote:
> Just got back from vacation. Thanks for the continued discussion. Just so
> I understand the current state. Looks like we've got a pretty good explanation
> of what's going on (though not completely sure), and backporting Steven's
> patches is still the way to go? I see that Sergey had sent an RFC series
> for similar things. Are those trying to solve the deadlock problem in a
> different way?On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 1:55 AM Sergey Senozhatsky

I suggest to go with backporting Steven's patchset. We do not have
anything better at the moment.

Best Regards,
Petr