Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 22 Oct 2018 19:01:46 +0200
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Cc:     Spock <dairinin@gmail.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: Memory management issue in 4.18.15
Message-ID: <20181022170146.GI18839@dhcp22.suse.cz>
References: <CADa=ObrwYaoNFn0x06mvv5W1F9oVccT5qjGM8qFBGNPoNuMUNw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181022083322.GE32333@dhcp22.suse.cz>
 <20181022150815.GA4287@tower.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181022150815.GA4287@tower.DHCP.thefacebook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon 22-10-18 15:08:22, Roman Gushchin wrote:
[...]
> RE backporting: I'm slightly surprised that only one patch of the memcg
> reclaim fix series has been backported. Either all or none makes much more
> sense to me.

Yeah, I think this is AUTOSEL trying to be clever again. I though it has
been agreed that MM is quite good at marking patches for stable and so
it was not considered by the machinery. Sasha?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs