Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <a401f973508662fa241b1410e08480884baca606.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [GIT PULL] code of conduct fixes for 4.19-rc8
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Date:   Mon, 22 Oct 2018 23:10:40 -0700
In-Reply-To: <800b68eb-9cf4-9c72-104d-0d4d9ae26ea1@infradead.org>
References: <1540066514.3464.22.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
         <20181022211025.GA8911@kroah.com>
         <23e41205115d317908c63d37a20ee316b44a8404.camel@perches.com>
         <800b68eb-9cf4-9c72-104d-0d4d9ae26ea1@infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.1-1build1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2018-10-22 at 23:05 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/22/18 9:16 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > As James Bottomley has suggested multiple times,
> > I'd much rather kernel development use the debian
> > code of conduct verbatim than even this modified one.
> > 
> > https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct
> 
> Yes, that and the Samba URL are good.
> 
> And it's disappointing how patches from James are acked or reviewed on the
> mailing lists and then mostly ignored (until the maintainer summit) while
> other patches are merged into the mainline git tree.
> 
> It seems to be very one-sided.

Perhaps an apt description is 'cabal like'.