Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265910AbUACDxR (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2004 22:53:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265913AbUACDxR (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2004 22:53:17 -0500 Received: from gizmo13ps.bigpond.com ([144.140.71.23]:40358 "HELO gizmo13ps.bigpond.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265910AbUACDws (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2004 22:52:48 -0500 Mail-Copies-To: never To: Linux Kernel List Cc: linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: udev - please help me to understand Keywords: need References: <200401021400.29569.mbuesch@freenet.de> From: Steve Youngs X-Face: #/1'_-|5_1$xjR,mVKhpfMJcRh8"k}_a{EkIO:Ox<]@zl/Yr|H,qH#3jJi6Aw(Mg@"!+Z"C N_S3!3jzW^FnPeumv4l#,E}J.+e%0q(U>#b-#`~>l^A!_j5AEgpU)>t+VYZ$:El7hLa1:%%L=3%B>n K{^jU_{& Organization: Linux Users - Fanatics Dept. X-URL: X-Request-PGP: X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: 1659 2093 19D5 C06E D320 3A20 1D27 DB4B A94B 3003 X-Attribution: SY Mail-Followup-To: Linux Kernel List , linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sf.net Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 13:52:38 +1000 In-Reply-To: <200401021400.29569.mbuesch@freenet.de> (Michael Buesch's message of "Fri, 02 Jan 2004 14:00:19 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1004 (Gnus v5.10.4) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1290 Lines: 37 --=-=-= |--==> "MB" == Michael Buesch writes: MB> _You_ have to decide if you need udev or don't. Precisely why I sent the post, to find out whether or not I need it, or if there are any benefits (for me) to using it. I don't, there aren't, so I won't. Pretty easy decision, actually. :-) And just so there's no confusion, I'm not against the concept of udev, I think it is a _very_ good idea. I just don't have a need for it right now, that's all. -- |---------------------| | Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. | | The proof of the pudding, is under the crust. | |---------------------------------| --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Eicq - The XEmacs ICQ Client iEYEABECAAYFAj/2PIoACgkQHSfbS6lLMAOvQwCfQlL029Wkhba1Ea0lSxRo9HGd 13kAoNXlC7pgv/4xCTO7mUuDUC2NcG9P =qTKM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/