Received: by 2002:ac0:aa62:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w31-v6csp3221592ima; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 02:18:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV63VdzHCP+jtOfiKb0L+L3GMG4ujDFYpBZam1W8xOgfKRzAkcs43M7sCWKzzlRMnOiBSxJqO X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e28a:: with SMTP id cf10-v6mr48805285plb.81.1540286330102; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 02:18:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1540286330; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=G2IDpxoFJifk1WtAH+Vpz56oa1PLDCjMOtfk+kKRly6wU2ZCnsGH/z6EufKWi6DE4N U69qfnnrGfvxsAbQDOQwlNNEFF4ehPQU/R2W6XOM+bY4MpsRNT3MtOwv/3IgcrbnOR2s 3m08mtmk7XAWzIyKorsG1sWd8A+ElxvgUUbd6FBZjwyVCvuHIshbRqWo0/GbizAlMt2H Lp46NbqzMlENXOS4s2zqTcZKtClamC1OI/IzzP2llaLisgeJwboCHtAXrq9D/cGR+J/r ONpGEtdzZTRepX/AOsmFY4lEZZ3HySVUuwIoRIRzKsAau1n290e2tOFOj2Y1JmLugd7m RHLQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=oHp8XmHdc87ScYqkaGEQEgqmfUkRYj98FrYEJY/8n3g=; b=Fu8UjUGTm1jAoHb9KHSeLgF9ol4iNkXtKaLciUejyKcqOJ7tv+za8DUZEGQDn9LlOa 9n/fb24mMyLLsxqcOoWwA5prqb1Uz2BGxuyrI/FhsUltLI1C6z0qL2ftqGwYMnlyxUPT NK744RrxMncl/VgpxkfFkm4dLNlsHGu0RmuDmsWmZCrXskg36GmUU7oN8hl1JwqKq6HO BOgFGAENmNmHEc/ePu84mJytSLOuBB9gXT/tM+IDDXD8wA71weo4mKlhqqw+QijlItpd 9jnSACUvJrrYZuEfPpxhjrYNfm/eVA+Zza2eJ064I+gCzWjJi0FGG7NxEbj7NWWyTsI3 si+Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o131-v6si718579pgo.591.2018.10.23.02.18.34; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 02:18:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728329AbeJWRkW (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 23 Oct 2018 13:40:22 -0400 Received: from mail.bootlin.com ([62.4.15.54]:41452 "EHLO mail.bootlin.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727714AbeJWRkW (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2018 13:40:22 -0400 Received: by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 957EA208FF; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 11:17:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.bootlin.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0 Received: from bbrezillon (aaubervilliers-681-1-25-52.w90-88.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.88.145.52]) by mail.bootlin.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E4B0208C7; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 11:17:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 11:17:38 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Catalin Marinas , Christoph Hellwig , Guenter Roeck , Jacek Anaszewski , Jens Axboe , Linus Walleij , Mark Brown , Ulf Hansson , Greg KH , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Git pull ack emails.. Message-ID: <20181023111738.7f50e2bd@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 09:41:32 +0100 Linus Torvalds wrote: > So I'm mainly pinging people I've already pulled to see how much > people actually _care_. Yes, the ack is nice, but do people care > enough that I should try to make that workflow change? Traditionally, > you can see that I've pulled from just seeing the end result when it > actually hits the public tree (which is yet another step removed from > the steps above - I do build tests between every pull, but I generally > tend to push out the end result in batches, usually a couple of times > a day). > > Comments? I do like to receive notifications when a PR is merged (or when a patch or patchset is applied). Note that I don't care if this notification is sent in-reply to the original email or in a separate email. I know Mark (Brown) has it automated in some way, not sure if it's through patchwork or if he's using a custom tool, and I'm also not sure it works for pull requests. Anyway, it's just a nice thing to have, and I can do without it if it's too complicated to automate. Regards, Boris