Received: by 2002:ac0:aa62:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w31-v6csp212513ima; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:16:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cHGoLrSIG9SLFDREhWkahljHW991QvcrSykASPxPLMagwwubQZ+CnJYymvWwzK2GDcjajp X-Received: by 2002:a62:3185:: with SMTP id x127-v6mr1446302pfx.88.1540361786190; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:16:26 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1540361786; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Esa+R4z0/2M2Bs0lPlIvh8nMlx7ngdzT1MDYhlGW6fMRX0Rtcx7wISPGMpkFID4QuR yKKDshaNZPKYBWnxxx7juSodeBOjOLlOjnngx/QUU2eA26FYKdQV8Ee0MgIkjB8YMzkg N76sdaUEbXFjvR1kNjcBfjn8DR2yUL2QnoDqaL9h1nkI9wqL1lhuUnGuF4DOsD6LHk11 oSPz+erCu8DMNbHCvMOKeagJnG1BAxCQ7tqm2B5HLN+tMzdRGyOovnf2wZQXxRM3ji9k COqGaKKCdr5CNOYiguQeuJHSKqkf52HMo6mn5bDCaNqqR1ftZ7H971t/ZA2Eegr4bh0Z UKXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=Xn9hBJXb5aRZ71SqWQ5qOHm6fdArzkJ3rKALtLD7wDk=; b=oG3CAPyoanh11dReRBxd27iIQsQD4fuUrZmAn0veDfrPopSJUjVlCuax9AxfIKHOyC 4SqI3qeINnE+A0ePakaxuZBTX03lgDQ4c1GbY4GqZ81xdrOI6UVARgllwV2rF7i9qj9z KA5dBPaOBF3YXU4i90CgfGdl+PnetbrT6v8DNw8xHlPsaftksRLu2g1R3t5Ln6etVvkE e9zW9yp/YMxpV86/lhU/BgdkogmQK3GoGKqIfQr1MRiHnoOXbuB+8rlSSFNf/QcVHV8r ODqli274iwYUp3HvGElaSusMu/ha1rcrmDz23c3K5fg5X5R081LOpkLqXZ+oEH6B2g0w q60g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g4-v6si3305253plo.254.2018.10.23.23.16.10; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 23:16:26 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726501AbeJXOm1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:42:27 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42286 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726080AbeJXOm1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:42:27 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36843AC90; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:15:46 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Arun KS Cc: Kees Cook , Konstantin Khlebnikov , Joe Perches , LKML , linux-mm , Minchan Kim , Arun Sudhilal , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: convert totalram_pages, totalhigh_pages and managed_pages to atomic. Message-ID: <20181024061546.GY18839@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1540229092-25207-1-git-send-email-arunks@codeaurora.org> <15247f54-53f3-83d4-6706-e9264b90ca7a@yandex-team.ru> <7a4fcbaee7efb71d2a3c6b403c090db4@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7a4fcbaee7efb71d2a3c6b403c090db4@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 24-10-18 10:47:52, Arun KS wrote: > On 2018-10-24 01:34, Kees Cook wrote: [...] > > Thank you -- I was struggling to figure out the best way to reply to > > this. :) > I'm sorry for the trouble caused. Sent the email using, > git send-email --to-cmd="scripts/get_maintainer.pl -i" > 0001-convert-totalram_pages-totalhigh_pages-and-managed_p.patch > > Is this not a recommended approach? Not really for tree wide mechanical changes. It is much more preferrable IMHO to only CC people who should review the intention of the change rather than each and every maintainer whose code is going to be changed. This is a case by case thing of course but as soon as you see a giant CC list from get_maintainer.pl then you should try to think twice to use it. If not sure, just ask on the mailing list. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs