Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] M_CAN Framework rework
To:     Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>, <wg@grandegger.com>,
        <mkl@pengutronix.de>, <davem@davemloft.net>
CC:     <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20181010142055.25271-1-dmurphy@ti.com>
 <e8485e2e-df04-0905-7055-c2228c0f1fa4@ti.com>
 <8247a28f-ae33-1ab1-b6d1-c89b839d357c@ti.com>
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
Message-ID: <8b793f8a-6ffb-9e23-1965-9e7c631031a1@ti.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Oct 2018 06:39:33 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8247a28f-ae33-1ab1-b6d1-c89b839d357c@ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 10/24/2018 02:33 AM, Faiz Abbas wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> On Thursday 18 October 2018 01:51 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Bump
>>
>> On 10/10/2018 09:20 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>>> All
>>>
>>> This patch series creates a m_can core framework that devices can register
>>> to.  The m_can core manages the Bosch IP and CAN frames.  Each device that
>>> is registered is responsible for managing device specific functions.
>>>
>>> This rewrite was suggested in a device driver submission for the TCAN4x5x
>>> device
>>> Reference upstream post:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/984163/
>>>
>>> For instance the TCAN device is a SPI device that uses a specific data payload to
>>> determine writes and reads.  In addition the device has a reset input as well
>>> as a wakeup pin.  The register offset of the m_can registers differs and must
>>> be set by the device attached to the core.
>>>
>>> The m_can core will use iomapped writes and reads as the default mechanism for
>>> writing and reading.  The device driver can provide over rides for this.
>>>
>>> This patch series is not complete as it does not handle the CAN interrupts
>>> nor can perform a CAN write.  If this patch series is deemed acceptable I will
>>> finish debugging the driver and post a non RFC series.
>>>
>>> Finally I did attempt to reduce the first patch with various git format patch
>>> directives but none seemed to reduce the patch.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> Dan Murphy (3):
>>>   can: m_can: Create m_can core to leverage common code
>>>   dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: Add DT bindings for TCAN4x5X driver
>>>   can: tcan4x5x: Add tcan4x5x driver to the kernel
>>>
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt  |   34 +
>>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/Kconfig                 |   18 +
>>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/Makefile                |    4 +-
>>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c                 | 1683 +----------------
>>>  .../net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c}   |  479 +++--
>>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h            |  100 +
>>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c              |  321 ++++
>>>  7 files changed, 722 insertions(+), 1917 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt
>>>  copy drivers/net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} (83%)
>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h
>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c
>>>
> 
> Patch 1/3 never arrived for me. Its not there on lkml either.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/10/611
> 

LKML seems to have issue with 1/3.  Here they were posted.
Maybe the patch is to large but I received all 3 + the cover letter.

https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/998019/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/998017/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/998020/

> Can you resend the complete series?
> 
> Thanks,
> Faiz
> 


-- 
------------------
Dan Murphy