Received: by 2002:ac0:aa62:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w31-v6csp1743688ima; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 04:20:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cl+6uqDy5z2plqZduZKR1Vg7GACV3I4/KM3F7bUjKS8mWythj9mI9KlIqTMoNbHREYdiTV X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8687:: with SMTP id g7-v6mr1183939plo.30.1540466440445; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 04:20:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1540466440; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=S7ToS5plWLmknSu8Ew6be97cAmkY7436fbheUZWiR0ixsl8rkzDnO0J0MeaVLaUr5j rD9YfpACeBZleZJ1YpdRJ4PWZOm3Zfqi+DKUHoh663jvfMU7JwMaBDAb1+APrQ8MQwlh Fripg2kBvTaCS5H+nqHVRHJQQ1vS1aY/+/vwRnLB3OkneJq6FC4l93iNJ1vXA8ytjS5D mf7/n6maAqXLSjxqo9KwDrEgqF05vaayWeizmPSTMF4dJFdQgMMDvp4pfVMpcvSpod+7 z1ST+sxbE/LzkEMDWfVCCWuFYIqMLvnlhjCsKGMUhYDzFseP5S934u9hyT1yRq9NuxeW 4/vw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=mfyN9LKNObf8tkYEXMYeci8dv0hWVtlIl3v/9U3yXuQ=; b=ZJyWBfd1hmBCPBIiLsZBcTx33X3Y+/AbYmPgaT/K84uw6Oy/V/YEAkms7iwI3cSl45 tQjpZ1qSB3rhB1TKfwpcWRaTHTU2Ru6eep2DZA1EmIEa0ijAzh34q6fSSP0cliPGMrtv O7TYX5IImF+UWGIqDkNt4TEzihQhUgSB/2FjeJA3VAcZ0+nMMNaWeAyjeyde763YWVqZ CibEuvr4LrL07C+DeSsd00ErukwL7Lxg9gBEYFpg10Xg6bta6MP3q9JdiEvfbYL3fyce 3bqBFdFJwbsfHCYyKptdju+iNU4iP0MJWluLV4HBZd+eQa/n2m90gusA+U54tnkd44R5 R5xQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mailbox.org header.s=mail20150812 header.b=oObn7p3I; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=mailbox.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g8-v6si7911689pli.338.2018.10.25.04.20.25; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 04:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@mailbox.org header.s=mail20150812 header.b=oObn7p3I; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=mailbox.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727431AbeJYTv7 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 25 Oct 2018 15:51:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.212]:37454 "EHLO mx1.mailbox.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727256AbeJYTv7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Oct 2018 15:51:59 -0400 Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:105:465:1:2:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B2E84BAEB; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:19:36 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mailbox.org; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:date:subject:subject:from:from:received; s= mail20150812; t=1540466375; bh=/n8Za6I7DOREQuWpWOmVFx7fazGHYKF7w 4mX4tZjkOw=; b=oObn7p3I10d4UEZnaYEtr03e4w316fkqa4kwvJ0wPqshC8d/u KdZT64XepXOaACCU+p4cT6uEDM5vMwxrm+G85bByVUL2XMK22v4XOMXhZYDG4hN5 GZlW69BkcF2Jzsgz/Glepjl9p3Vs6b0r42Qz+87T76UA6GuxhkOSnDvVqoHZ7we7 2IfEqVjBINiibjXcoupj/vDD+vsHniQ+7DP4mvg7GPvrb8svZv1O5ufPAR1MFuwf yc/ETW52/221wFPgyz9J+MOKFK4sknkCLoiK8j4dCWC9wNaf2gKGCbAuvZ7/617G E5HA0EgEXhup4yVHOi0+8qUInyuCEPe0T1EMw== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.241]) by spamfilter02.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter02.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.116]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id ErS1VCihmAar; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:19:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Rainer Fiebig To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: NeilBrown , Greg Kroah-Hartman , ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Thomas Gleixner , Olof Johansson , Chris Mason , Mishi Choudhary Subject: Re: Call to Action Re: [PATCH 0/7] Code of Conduct: Fix some wording, and add an interpretation document Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:20:56 +0200 Message-ID: <2341648.lzjnUGKk1z@siriux> In-Reply-To: <87y3ar80ac.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> References: <20181020134908.GA32218@kroah.com> <87y3ar80ac.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart42791249.HQLrouHPFn"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart42791249.HQLrouHPFn Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Am Montag, 22. Oktober 2018, 08:20:11 schrieb NeilBrown: > On Sat, Oct 20 2018, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > Hi all, > >=20 > > As everyone knows by now, we added a new Code of Conduct to the ker= nel > > tree a few weeks ago. >=20 > I wanted to stay detached from all this, but as remaining (publicly) > silent might be seen (publicly) as acquiescing, I hereby declare that= : > I reject, as illegitimate, this Code and the process by > which it is being "developed". >=20 > It is clear from the surrounding discussions that this is well outsid= e our > core competencies. It will be flawed, it isn't what we need. >=20 > I call on any other community members who reject this process to say = so, > not to remain silent. > #Iobject >=20 > We don't need a "Code of Conduct" nearly as much as we need "Leadersh= ip > in conduct". Without the leadership, any code looks like a joke. >=20 [...] =20 > I call on you, Greg: > - to abandon this divisive attempt to impose a "Code of Conduct" > - to revert 8a104f8b5867c68 Yes but this seems increasingly unlikely now. However, there may be an=20= alternative. Jugding by the release-message for 4.19, some people here are fans of=20= Monty Python's. No wonder - as those guys are famous for being unrelent= ing=20 supporters of Political Correctness. So one would be on the safe side if one just supplemented "Our Pledge"=20= with this: =09"Everybody has the right to be offended." I think, John Cleese would also welcome this.[1] What do you think? Regards! Rainer Fiebig [1] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3427218/Political-correctn= ess-killing-comedy-says-John-Cleese-Monty-Python-star-believes-fear-off= ending-certain-groups-lead-1984-style-society-free-expression-not-allow= ed.html =2D-=20 The truth always turns out to be simpler than you thought. Richard Feynman --nextPart42791249.HQLrouHPFn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE6yx5PjBNuGB2qJXG8OH3JiWK+PUFAlvRpxgACgkQ8OH3JiWK +PWDjRAAzzl6KYxqqlSq+q5EgB3Uy4eLnj0xZJ3SEePGvtSWwf+k78ESTZ/sU7O2 gUGsEk+4F8N4CK0Y+J0Z5DrXdpCTu0shzojYdUmzE0unthzycVdlRbXdQd5UER0R o6gpHfqbPvsGhtKNyj2oaqRzwnJNWsz16LW81fr0dLRZtg+9vlUulYz3nvyf6VQC kHFIR//gRyyx37Loo1lpZBSBhd+MDi95wz7yWJWM9CGxR/MvEvjNGvpPSg6O/vof FuQqCR5k4mVSU7NkcqBgMBPGVyzMivXEIYGvSDBOHa14NiBtpqcn0P2vBQ6jwBfX LIO0sq2Crk91zyT7Mw32ru8CO/z3m1Pxyxs6QjZnTfLQoOdG6+sy/uSQgK0HS0aW lF0LdaaGTnf8ngVmhmNpVdrQS/4MZAeaiUZSFs1skf11Gd/z8cdi2IvHInunWUxx BOgOhlrMWA+sj4Gqxa9zchFvUQLDNAX2JZ4AJ1a8JXIDKpuEQhXs0eqWtRkXTgtU qOTmuSVJ/LR0WjXvXumQhqZ2y3lNAz17pzVLcq5grik4dr8+XmSkY88Imi/laNE9 q+fpOQDaUEusmdshb5BnYxmgsA9keQE/XPEeLZUz/U6ywxHaxmo/0Y0hUOuWe9q1 /AL+tEOirMM6xLbeHjRru5MctlId9OEtN09n29coJxd9cLwoTYI= =Yy1m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart42791249.HQLrouHPFn--