Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 26 Oct 2018 01:08:13 +0800
From:   Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        gregkh <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, c-sky_gcc_upstream@c-sky.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 21/21] csky: support dword access for get_user_size()
Message-ID: <20181025170813.GB9747@guoren-Inspiron-7460>
References: <cover.1539655731.git.ren_guo@c-sky.com>
 <4bc11ff0cff5960892a464189605f9bc808383fc.1539655732.git.ren_guo@c-sky.com>
 <CAK8P3a1wfeWboHvU1o_kooMc2hML8iWcNrz=mp6tYT52iGwfjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181018034117.GD15088@guoren-Inspiron-7460>
 <CAK8P3a0cFhBE1tX0xisP__MYiBfaAUQHsW6ZhkmTPocRf1Zb6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181018085751.GA21934@guoren-Inspiron-7460>
 <CAK8P3a28SLy85pCq9eS-xnLuFo4XAJmnKCiy0XF9ZZtLxfaUDw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a28SLy85pCq9eS-xnLuFo4XAJmnKCiy0XF9ZZtLxfaUDw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 08:17:47AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:57 AM Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:34:00AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:41 AM Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 05:44:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 5:33 AM Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Support dword access for get_user_size and redesign put_user_size with
> > > > > > the same style of get_user_size. It's Ok to use xxx_user_asm_common for
> > > > > > all size of variable with ldb, ldh, ldw, ld.d
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ld.d rx, (addr, 0) could "rx <= addr" "and r(x+1) <= addr+4" and this also
> > > > > > follow abiv2 gcc ABI for dword access.
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you sure this is correct for this?
> > > > >
> > > > > static inline u32 get_64_to_32(__u64 __user *p)
> > > > > {
> > > > >       u32 ret;
> > > > >       get_user(ret, p);
> > > > >       return ret;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > If I read __get_user_asm_common() right, the ld.d would overwrite
> > > > > two registers, but the caller only expects one, so it clobbers one
> > > > > that might be in use.
> > > > Ah... BUG! I only consider the get_user(u64, u64 *) :P
> > > >
> > > > Change to:
> > > > case 8:                                                 \
> > > > __get_user_asm_dword((x), ptr, "ld.d", retval);         \
> > > > break;
> > > >
> > > > #define __get_user_asm_dword(x, ptr, err)               \
> > > > do {                                                    \
> > > >         u64 tmp;                                        \
> > > >         __get_user_asm_common(tmp, ptr, "ld.d", err);   \
> > > >         x = typeof(x) tmp;                              \
> > > > } while(0)
> > > >
> > > > #define __put_user_asm_dword(x, ptr, err)               \
> > > > do {                                                    \
> > > >         u64 tmp = (u64) x;                              \
> > > >         __put_user_asm_common(tmp, ptr, "st.d", err);   \
> > > > } while(0)
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think this will cause warnings for code that passes a pointer.
> > >
> > > The 64-bit __get_user() is really hard, and most 32-bit architectures don't
> > > implement it at all. If you really want to add it, have a look at what
> > > x86 and arm do. IIRC they both use __builtin_choose_expr(),
> > Thx for the tips and I'll drop the patch first for the upstream.
> >
> > I want to implement it because of make allmodconfig and
> > drivers/android/binder.c need it. I'll learn __builtin_choose_expr()
> > and prepare patch next.
> 
> I think we should fix binder.c instead. Many other architectures
> have the same problem.
Yes, and I'll study the file.

Best Regards
 Guo Ren