Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264954AbUADIy0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 03:54:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264600AbUADIy0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 03:54:26 -0500 Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70]:31010 "EHLO sj-iport-1.cisco.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264954AbUADIyZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 03:54:25 -0500 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040104195316.02151e98@171.71.163.14> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 19:54:14 +1100 To: Soeren Sonnenburg From: Lincoln Dale Subject: Re: xterm scrolling speed - scheduling weirdness in 2.6 ?! Cc: Con Kolivas , Willy Tarreau , Mark Hahn , Linux Kernel , gillb4@telusplanet.net In-Reply-To: <1073203762.9851.394.camel@localhost> References: <200401041242.47410.kernel@kolivas.org> <200401040815.54655.kernel@kolivas.org> <20040103233518.GE3728@alpha.home.local> <200401041242.47410.kernel@kolivas.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 524 Lines: 18 At 07:09 PM 4/01/2004, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: [..] >Looking at that how can it not be a scheduling problem .... out of interest, have you tried to see how 2.4.xx compares when compiled with HZ set to 1000? (or conversely, 2.6 compiled with HZ set to 100) cheers, lincoln. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/