Received: by 2002:ac0:aa62:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id w31-v6csp97810ima; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 16:15:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5c6CZPfYNN9nbeUHeBu+DbVFsMulhqyQnK/iFRZXfSeg3P7bVusFx/sF8fhSOtrd5nVd3TH X-Received: by 2002:a62:e20a:: with SMTP id a10-v6mr1109699pfi.75.1540509313862; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 16:15:13 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1540509313; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EDD/IeMotUU3NTimBh0PlCPZf9u4GvSanQmWabykluA6GzgWCPTqlFjmZkovoWA0GS l2n7Fq+FoRHJGRq/kZxoPC8eHLJQeNmS20UyD/9lTvRiE5NLQ+U2pfd5dhuPnGu4aQ56 xIiEyzRAVF1YXKrOPIZArVkSxXV6atJkfYSCVCIu4UB6AyxiQqBbEOCLpdx1Lxhd/LMY nQvDAprnUfbaJ5rs2OlEZCIqkcdg6Y+0grM7gg3NmZ/jX3sTV5fasV50UxZ0IzyraRf4 hussrVaCrdgNfDtxhA0bWDyao/pOeuAAp335XCdhamjAUuC+1J++JmPCEJUeHfSrSxAr BFGg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=af71/DOnSUphBaOPS/rSJFGlFHRSxXGPxF2Xlq2VTpo=; b=Dwp+eRG6/sLawqESCoHwQ7B4Z8Cc0z1TTv0pCvZcV24KZZWtkDsGYNVXqmbAi7D3L8 qk0ZnZHWxpth9v7mL2nUQ8CiR+2AP7QTv9/jPdnaSR15V4crbBaD6jOcttPf1wYPQvhA rk/v0XBg+bUxq15zOfZNfy+mdx0Ok1L+VKvJQdX73pPdfzPXapJut0Jld7hASpSoDNcd BRl3Fmu4Ht1/o/NQ3Y4vupAZcQ5QoIhn1nRr5NOWeQpBp+xnRAJvI/OROZntpfDJqJXk 1G4XzKJm8Ta6bwONf+hMMPGk9BDDJtJBLBiQDH2HdibrklvRMijfEsv5o/hBwx/n1Gg5 N9/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="liZ/JfMV"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o5-v6si9463561plh.96.2018.10.25.16.14.57; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 16:15:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b="liZ/JfMV"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727579AbeJZHtE (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 26 Oct 2018 03:49:04 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53072 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726796AbeJZHtE (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2018 03:49:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f48.google.com (mail-wr1-f48.google.com [209.85.221.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C9F120848 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 23:14:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1540509268; bh=sanClo23U4iow7KnRInfHdOX9E10uWIJM4CLFB2TFQI=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=liZ/JfMVoH3OAHXN5gszAlwN/FG0CwFu40LQe+MH1Y4X6YG1UyuTWkt7FYNm2CuvE 4N+LdeOLmwCgyGsVR0QYp+tbHgS8dzHSK0jn+42DRiGkylVNJZdCcUhFWpxwCxRMEP azHt/Q+rEcEvCqNvYfG92tZZRW+kvyo+zDTZfREg= Received: by mail-wr1-f48.google.com with SMTP id w5-v6so10974550wrt.2 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 16:14:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIiv1DBkagKkMA7HuSCoRlJL6b12BU6Usxlhyl3SqFU65R5DugX DfQvXZZp/bI4R+UrVY08Hu0vWxvIFp7Ax11kaawrmg== X-Received: by 2002:adf:82c9:: with SMTP id 67-v6mr3488291wrc.131.1540509267132; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 16:14:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181023184234.14025-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> <20181023184234.14025-4-chang.seok.bae@intel.com> <20181024192137.GI6218@tassilo.jf.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20181024192137.GI6218@tassilo.jf.intel.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 16:14:15 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [v3 03/12] x86/fsgsbase/64: Add intrinsics/macros for FSGSBASE instructions To: Andi Kleen , Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Lutomirski , "Bae, Chang Seok" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Dave Hansen , "Metzger, Markus T" , "Ravi V. Shankar" , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:21 PM Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 11:53:54AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:43 AM Chang S. Bae wrote: > > > > > > From: Andi Kleen > > > > > > Add C intrinsics and assembler macros for the new FSBASE and GSBASE > > > instructions. > > > > > > Very straight forward. Used in followon patches. > > > > > > [ luto: Rename the variables from FS and GS to FSBASE and GSBASE and > > > make safe to include on 32-bit kernels. ] > > > > > > v2: Use __always_inline > > > > > > [ chang: Revise the changelog. Place them in . Replace > > > the macros with GAS-compatible ones. ] > > > > > > If GCC supports it, we can add -mfsgsbase to CFLAGS and use the builtins > > > here for extra performance. > > > > Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski # C parts only > > > > With the caveat that I'm not convinced that the memory clobbers are > > needed. The __force_order trick in special_insns.h would probably be > > more appropriate. > > > > I don't feel qualified to review the asm part without some research. > > Whereas hpa or Boris could probably review it with their eyes closed. > > BTW the other option would be to update the min-binutils requirement > to 2.21 (currently it is 2.20) and then write it directly without .byte. > I believe 2.21 added support for these instructions. > > (It's only a binutils requirement, don't need gcc support) > I'd personally be fine with this. Linus? Thomas? Ingo?