Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265159AbUADKMG (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 05:12:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265272AbUADKMG (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 05:12:06 -0500 Received: from mail.mediaways.net ([193.189.224.113]:5270 "HELO mail.mediaways.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265159AbUADKME (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 05:12:04 -0500 Subject: Re: xterm scrolling speed - scheduling weirdness in 2.6 ?! From: Soeren Sonnenburg To: Lincoln Dale Cc: Con Kolivas , Willy Tarreau , Mark Hahn , Linux Kernel , gillb4@telusplanet.net In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20040104195316.02151e98@171.71.163.14> References: <200401041242.47410.kernel@kolivas.org> <200401040815.54655.kernel@kolivas.org> <20040103233518.GE3728@alpha.home.local> <200401041242.47410.kernel@kolivas.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20040104195316.02151e98@171.71.163.14> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1073211091.3261.4.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 11:11:32 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 712 Lines: 19 On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 09:54, Lincoln Dale wrote: > At 07:09 PM 4/01/2004, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > [..] > >Looking at that how can it not be a scheduling problem .... > > out of interest, have you tried to see how 2.4.xx compares when compiled > with HZ set to 1000? > (or conversely, 2.6 compiled with HZ set to 100) assuming you mean changing the HZ value in include/param.h to 1000/100 yes 2.4 with HZ=1000 is fine and 2.6 with HZ=100 still #%$@$^&!! Soeren - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/