Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 26 Oct 2018 06:49:36 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To:     esr@thyrsus.com, "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        visionsofalice@redchan.it,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, rms@gnu.org,
        bruce@perens.com, moglen@columbia.edu, bkuhn@sfconservancy.org,
        editor@lwn.net, NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
        Mishi Choudhary <mishi@linux.com>,
        linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The linux devs can rescind their license grant.
Message-ID: <20181026054936.GK32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20181020134908.GA32218@kroah.com>
 <87y3ar80ac.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
 <c6bf1877-6e29-50ec-ffa8-314ab35ec9ce@redhat.com>
 <185b786a2bd6e8d527dca161dc42e4f1@redchan.it>
 <20181025081911.GB11343@kroah.com>
 <20181025193901.GD26403@thyrsus.com>
 <20181025204718.GB25649@thunk.org>
 <20181025214123.GA2448@thyrsus.com>
 <20181025230656.GJ32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20181026022836.GA12924@thyrsus.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20181026022836.GA12924@thyrsus.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:28:36PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>:
> > 	* in case it needs to be spelled out: I am not at all interested
> > in that kind of stunts.  One of the reasons I thoroughly despise RMS
> > and his bunch is the leverage game they tried to play with GPLv3;
> > damned if I'm going to lower myself to their level.
> 
> Sorry, I did not mean to imply that you are one with the license-revokers.
> More like "if even Al Viro thinks you fucked up your process, it would be
> unwise to dismiss the opposition to the CoC as mere trolls".

Kindly stop conflating opposition to CoC with that kind of idiocy.