Received: by 2002:ac0:98c7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g7-v6csp169633imd; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 06:52:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fKM0ZREiWDHjAwjwKt14G2wejHUhOeSJKzE5ffZiFj5kFolqmYAyc/xYUzKREhcoOZDQxU X-Received: by 2002:a62:4e50:: with SMTP id c77-v6mr3760799pfb.187.1540561924944; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 06:52:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1540561924; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=J/5syVuu7q/BYYiJc25dhDIJodG7uuLvG5S6BmvEkJNGTihjhh2RQmH0AdsLAnLEJ6 mJwzC2DXlisVPrG60j1t64qnhLBDaqcZ/0IctEk/57wjhHJ7PoY4NgAbLwIMA7gI75vB XPe2YY90yp5hTBbc5jfFbef3Jg11rQrGWxN6pD5xzdaiQ7dF778NqrTvo7DFiQ8EYOCu XgBGWJwcrJM88zhDUisOTSd2iRWVCPAIRYwDl8Fsl736cv9fk9ozuBy6/7XRVUTUs82F AJZSwYqgFxCWGjf7/gr9XZhZjO2so9nj8Qu5BaYVrbxKNsslC9L202FAx/MDs0Pphwfj zXcg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=nfmdqBUNQfFnmivH2oQnsCmbtUt8hbYSPWafWJVqw0U=; b=rdI0nC93U91DTNYzLa0SkVzlLNz7e6P1GBY6psgYuoS7tJbMo+4AJ8HaCySnW+6IfR 07Yi/b4l5USInCLNbsKjGrMXasYFLi993z+TNqP1rnf+PrSvls/05SbY3rMHvZiZk2bj gXnD8mNmPq7zNsp3QnvQje6xGn6y4P4B8OScGeE3RKv09hUKISKrzQ9Y1FZVTwLrHsHV 8lTgizOoui3BMxNQzy2Z8/NsDwBcOyrS4sLu2ZWepiPFQgUelI2s4Qh6PG/2IGL+frui tvjtBH2CjmU6hCqV4lsv3VFcvRNK3N/DO0VLnAC69LHRRstwybaj015luff6rLCeTaxe 4Apw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e2-v6si10003554pgm.95.2018.10.26.06.51.48; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 06:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726406AbeJZWZj (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 26 Oct 2018 18:25:39 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:44726 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726014AbeJZWZj (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2018 18:25:39 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF8BAF62; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 13:48:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne To: stefan.wahren@i2se.com, eric@anholt.net, dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.org Cc: nsaenzjulienne@suse.de, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH RFC 00/18] staging: vchiq: remove dead code & misc fixes Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:47:55 +0200 Message-Id: <20181026134813.7775-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi All, This series was written in parallel with reading and understanding the vchiq code. So excuse me for the lack of logic in the sequence of patches. It's an RFC for various reasons, first I think it's going to clash with the last Stefan's series. Also I'm not used to doing big series. The main focus was to delete as much code as possible, I've counted around 550 lines, which is not bad. Apart from that there are some patches enforcing proper kernel APIs usage. The only patch that really changes code is the vchiq_ioc_copy_element_data() rewrite, I was having doubts whether to add it into the series, but since it's a RFC, I don't think it hurts. The last commit updates the TODO list with some of my observations, I realise some of the might be a little opinionated. If anything it's going to force a discussion on the topic, which is nice. The series was developed on top of linux-next, and was tested on a RPIv3B+ with audio, video and running vchiq_test. Regards, Nicolas === Nicolas Saenz Julienne (18): staging: vchiq_core: rework vchiq_get_config staging: vchiq_arm: rework close/remove_service IOCTLS staging: vchiq_shim: delete vchi_service_create stagning: vchiq_arm: use list_for_each_entry when accessing bulk_waiter_list staging: vchiq_arm: get rid of vchi_mh.h staging: vchiq_arm: rework vchiq_ioc_copy_element_data staging: vchiq-core: get rid of is_master distinction staging: vchiq_core: remove unnecessary safety checks in vchiq_init_state staging: vchiq_core: do not initialize semaphores twice staging: vchiq_core: don't add a wmb() before remote_event_signal() staging: vchiq_arm: use completions instead of semaphores staging: vchiq_util: use completions instead of semaphores staging: vchiq_core: use completions instead of semaphores staging: vchiq_util: get rid of unneeded memory barriers stagning: vchiq_core: fix logic redundancy in parse_open staging: vchiq_arm: rework probe and init functions staging: vchiq_arm: fix open/release cdev functions staging: vchiq: add more tasks to the TODO list .../staging/vc04_services/interface/vchi/TODO | 46 +- .../vc04_services/interface/vchi/vchi.h | 8 - .../vc04_services/interface/vchi/vchi_mh.h | 42 -- .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.c | 18 +- .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_arm.c | 598 ++++++++---------- .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.c | 511 +++------------ .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_core.h | 47 +- .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_if.h | 11 +- .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_shim.c | 32 - .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_util.c | 48 +- .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_util.h | 6 +- 11 files changed, 429 insertions(+), 938 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchi/vchi_mh.h -- 2.19.1