Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262446AbUADOKP (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 09:10:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265512AbUADOKO (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 09:10:14 -0500 Received: from aun.it.uu.se ([130.238.12.36]:48307 "EHLO aun.it.uu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262446AbUADOKM (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 09:10:12 -0500 Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:10:06 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <200401041410.i04EA61e007769@harpo.it.uu.se> From: Mikael Pettersson To: szepe@pinerecords.com Subject: Re: Pentium M config option for 2.6 Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 643 Lines: 17 On Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 13:33:58 +0100, Tomas Szepe wrote: > > IOW, don't lie to the compiler and pretend P-M == P4 > > with that -march=pentium4. > > What do you recommend to use as march then? There is > no pentiumm subarch support in gcc yet; I was convinced > p4 was the closest match. march=pentium3 is the closest safe choice, at least until gcc implements P-M specific support. /Mikael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/