Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:11:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:10:54 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:52740 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:10:43 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 19:09:45 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Andreas Dilger Cc: Matthew Wilcox , LA Walsh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems Message-ID: <20010326190945.I31126@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20010326181803.F31126@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <200103261747.f2QHlEX19564@webber.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200103261747.f2QHlEX19564@webber.adilger.int>; from adilger@turbolinux.com on Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:47:13AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 10:47:13AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: > What do you mean by problems 5 years down the road? The real issue is that > this 32-bit block count limit affects composite devices like MD RAID and > LVM today, not just individual disks. There have been several postings > I have seen with people having a problem _today_ with a 2TB limit on > devices. people who can afford 2TB of disc can afford to buy a 64-bit processor. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/