Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20181028021653.155513-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
References: <20181028021653.155513-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Date:   Sat, 27 Oct 2018 21:44:31 -0700
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YTCJS9Yxt4J=nbF+Omdon_4Li2BUiVzALGX246fMA9J2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] rcu: doc: update example about stale data
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc:     "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 7:16 PM, Joel Fernandes (Google)
<joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> The RCU example for 'rejecting stale data' on system-call auditting
> stops iterating through the rules if a deleted one is found. It makes
> more sense to continue looking at other rules once a deleted one is
> rejected. Although the original example is fine, this makes it more
> meaningful.

Sorry, I messed up the patch title, it is supposed to be 'doc: rcu:
...'. I can resend it if you want.

thanks,

- Joel