Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264498AbUADVzo (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:55:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264535AbUADVzo (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:55:44 -0500 Received: from twilight.ucw.cz ([81.30.235.3]:26856 "EHLO twilight.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264498AbUADVzm (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:55:42 -0500 Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:55:41 +0100 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Cc: Rob Love , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Pentium M config option for 2.6 Message-ID: <20040104215541.GB14982@ucw.cz> References: <200401041227.i04CReNI004912@harpo.it.uu.se> <1073228608.2717.39.camel@fur> <20040104162516.GB31585@redhat.com> <1073233988.5225.9.camel@fur> <200401042034.i04KYm1P024587@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401042034.i04KYm1P024587@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1626 Lines: 40 On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 03:34:47PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Sun, 04 Jan 2004 11:33:08 EST, Rob Love said: > > > I actually like this patch (perhaps since I have a P-M :) and think it > > ought to go in, although I agree with others that the P-M is more of a > > super-P3 than a scaled down P4. > > Same here - /proc/cpuinfo says: > > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 15 > model : 2 > model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 Mobile CPU 1.60GHz > > Question for those more knowledgeable: Are there any known Pentium4 features > enabled in the kernel with the PENTIUM4 options that simply Will Not Work on a > 4M chipset (similar to a kernel built for a 586 not working on a 486), or are > the differences limited to "sub-optimal performance" (for example, compiling > with -mpentium4 results in code that runs but schedules less optimally)? If > there are, they must be fairly obscure corner cases, since I haven't knowingly > hit one in several months.. :) > > 2.7 timeframe - are there any added features of a P4 core we would *like* > to exploit that aren't on a P4M? Pentium 4M is a real Pentium 4 core, but with mobile features. Pentium M is a beefed up Pentium III core, with mobile features and all Pentium 4 extra features (instructions, etc). I think that answers your question. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/