Received: by 2002:ac0:98c7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g7-v6csp3162236imd; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 02:45:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cBooy5m6t+KYAGPMq4P/NX6xSrpoqTXqGB8DbSfzdiaBEJWO1qWFCZHai4vDBJhGqfutCB X-Received: by 2002:a63:ed55:: with SMTP id m21-v6mr13134125pgk.147.1540806349673; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 02:45:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1540806349; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=u2+9di8U4zkpHYWlit3jLrmkm9uB3PB2dMpHncpYts3uRnIvrexHLSnqtbQGFJ7jch lS3+scZY+58izhBvd0c6bCd4rN4fuXu4vBewv2QDpCO8T0ZTAsjySgRHf1VXow8R4Ej6 ynqd9XRE1pCvQtcp2HCBm9YzsaJFw5e34YeTAErXOe45ag4caRJHYj188oEg5OTHvUJ/ 6878JENiJlX/+BDY5jd5ZasyLo9koMqSBN9rAlB5NHhM3w6dU/W70PPPHIpiMwezfetr IT90koderuQjHrpbTlAf2Z3BOHuIybs59UwFIRfxywIOIaxUCYkrs2p3QBcsEDiSIzDY bmiw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=Dh40iVT1fuUDMmaQP9Dog+0ksth3tv/gdXKRBh/ARfA=; b=ZC/bbvXgKq74+UXhBY/9ukkSuFH4/gRHMAE2cERJ/nYamGzxFoEjFqRW4GF8feT6yd KUBlIjSoLGsIrLvDbj6xnkJQjjnDYVpEUAr+/Sr1mb7dG80FfuyQsnNG+rfcPxwkh6fi S79L9p3RzDMmjgCF8EDXet8S3ZfZ+wuKb67DzS4QIE6jNBZRs3zlS+4OoIz2sFbOvOqH zQTD5hSvnT7kvAmMbd0MkRcUOIA1u17v/l9X1jr6ArKw6arWeGP65MaEwUttXIlQAtOQ 0SeSfCovjdMpUlj/tcyNZOCfsQ1I7kX+DAvNOHxk4Ctt1RHtDzeNSKa3C/HfqRpQYV57 9U4A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HwfEDNpT; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c38-v6si16301725pgl.166.2018.10.29.02.45.34; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 02:45:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HwfEDNpT; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729595AbeJ2SdG (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:33:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com ([209.85.128.67]:54905 "EHLO mail-wm1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726720AbeJ2SdG (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 14:33:06 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id r63-v6so7477303wma.4; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 02:45:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Dh40iVT1fuUDMmaQP9Dog+0ksth3tv/gdXKRBh/ARfA=; b=HwfEDNpTIsRB07hNH3+x2w1/KuqsLMHzCuqZsyysBYeb4WQY/paUmFAuJKtUmTMdQx cjUcH/TWGNkjngxwKilu/NJo75vUiZScx7IkKeUWxuhlx6M/kPHE3JMKYd09BUpwhUPw sEvFoOeVOT/eMBK7sUYExf1EqrMqclA5l7qIikWrg3bPTmJ/UY38LzyddQTiBJjn9lgh YWMgcYIz7Kv5XRJKxww8EzmxA8oRGIqsTPECqtOhRFkoU616DYNOIwm/sRFaFi3zJv8a s6GrklC0cwFmGFhwmlQDUMg00c9AwMRFJBvmWqNNruhVL6/a4MUA/jocGjcPq/FIWASJ LPFQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Dh40iVT1fuUDMmaQP9Dog+0ksth3tv/gdXKRBh/ARfA=; b=igqU9/09YSdMDIVT2pwO1j+qpP+KgOWGVVPRgVsTna5cc5Sp4C3Gl51HPlrnizNeHS 11xoBw+1tuSz0T3YxfnShjkq0VatV0j6pYfBHqodBcRMq83Lr5If3N8CH9h5lm4MgPlc YfnbOLrGbnypPgXE+s6TRtNQwCYUWD2J2O6YOaZhR7PWn8AZqfmoLgjC9qL1pYM1/qB8 si0KjOZnlqJ3nJRpoMf3iQwgZaFPWnwDnMLNCZbaPG1xrYY/p4lSV8WNiEsNLES+hgDR 8DSqT5E8C2JI55Y7qT4pZT+4dMdkdLGgzPSAFpWo6Mn12aLQSWwoEzVulxS93nbfHugq Q2Gg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIny4CHX2e0hEiaei7ZGxXCDXI/u2QAAfSDQYsF8haejoe8Wo5e C+vLvbTf5vYB6YvdBReNs0BXPJBDhYglXawA+fA= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:8601:: with SMTP id i1-v6mr12852784wmd.148.1540806310827; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 02:45:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1540641134-21485-1-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <1540641134-21485-1-git-send-email-jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com> From: Ming Lei Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 17:44:58 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V5] block: fix the DISCARD request merge To: "jianchao.wang" Cc: Jens Axboe , "Martin K. Petersen" , Christoph Hellwig , linux-block , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 7:50 PM Jianchao Wang wrote: > > There are two cases when handle DISCARD merge. > If max_discard_segments == 1, the bios/requests need to be contiguous > to merge. If max_discard_segments > 1, it takes every bio as a range > and different range needn't to be contiguous. > > But now, attempt_merge screws this up. It always consider contiguity > for DISCARD for the case max_discard_segments > 1 and cannot merge > contiguous DISCARD for the case max_discard_segments == 1, because > rq_attempt_discard_merge always returns false in this case. > This patch fixes both of the two cases above. > > Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang > --- > > V5: > - get rid of the redundant 'else' in blk_discard_mergable > > V4: > - introduce blk_try_req_merge as suggestion of Christoph. > > V3: > - Introduce blk_discard_mergable into attempt_merge and > blk_try_merge. > - Some comment changes. > > V2: > - Add max_discard_segments > 1 checking in attempt_merge. > - Change patch title and comment. > - Add more comment in attempt_merge > > block/blk-merge.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c > index 42a4674..6b5ad27 100644 > --- a/block/blk-merge.c > +++ b/block/blk-merge.c > @@ -714,6 +714,31 @@ static void blk_account_io_merge(struct request *req) > part_stat_unlock(); > } > } > +/* > + * Two cases of handling DISCARD merge: > + * If max_discard_segments > 1, the driver takes every bio > + * as a range and send them to controller together. The ranges > + * needn't to be contiguous. > + * Otherwise, the bios/requests will be handled as same as > + * others which should be contiguous. > + */ > +static inline bool blk_discard_mergable(struct request *req) > +{ > + if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD && > + queue_max_discard_segments(req->q) > 1) > + return true; > + return false; > +} > + > +enum elv_merge blk_try_req_merge(struct request *req, struct request *next) > +{ > + if (blk_discard_mergable(req)) > + return ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE; > + else if (blk_rq_pos(req) + blk_rq_sectors(req) == blk_rq_pos(next)) > + return ELEVATOR_BACK_MERGE; > + > + return ELEVATOR_NO_MERGE; > +} > > /* > * For non-mq, this has to be called with the request spinlock acquired. > @@ -731,12 +756,6 @@ static struct request *attempt_merge(struct request_queue *q, > if (req_op(req) != req_op(next)) > return NULL; > > - /* > - * not contiguous > - */ > - if (blk_rq_pos(req) + blk_rq_sectors(req) != blk_rq_pos(next)) > - return NULL; > - > if (rq_data_dir(req) != rq_data_dir(next) > || req->rq_disk != next->rq_disk > || req_no_special_merge(next)) > @@ -760,11 +779,19 @@ static struct request *attempt_merge(struct request_queue *q, > * counts here. Handle DISCARDs separately, as they > * have separate settings. > */ > - if (req_op(req) == REQ_OP_DISCARD) { > + > + switch (blk_try_req_merge(req, next)) { > + case ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE: > if (!req_attempt_discard_merge(q, req, next)) > return NULL; > - } else if (!ll_merge_requests_fn(q, req, next)) > + break; > + case ELEVATOR_BACK_MERGE: > + if (!ll_merge_requests_fn(q, req, next)) > + return NULL; > + break; > + default: > return NULL; > + } > > /* > * If failfast settings disagree or any of the two is already > @@ -888,8 +915,7 @@ bool blk_rq_merge_ok(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio) > > enum elv_merge blk_try_merge(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio) > { > - if (req_op(rq) == REQ_OP_DISCARD && > - queue_max_discard_segments(rq->q) > 1) > + if (blk_discard_mergable(rq)) > return ELEVATOR_DISCARD_MERGE; > else if (blk_rq_pos(rq) + blk_rq_sectors(rq) == bio->bi_iter.bi_sector) > return ELEVATOR_BACK_MERGE; > -- > 2.7.4 > Reviewed-by: Ming Lei -- Ming Lei