Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265835AbUAEAwD (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:52:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265836AbUAEAwD (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:52:03 -0500 Received: from mail-03.iinet.net.au ([203.59.3.35]:16521 "HELO mail.iinet.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S265835AbUAEAv7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:51:59 -0500 Message-ID: <3FF8B52B.3060003@cyberone.com.au> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 11:51:55 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030827 Debian/1.4-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Willy Tarreau CC: Lincoln Dale , Soeren Sonnenburg , Con Kolivas , Mark Hahn , Linux Kernel , gillb4@telusplanet.net Subject: Re: xterm scrolling speed - scheduling weirdness in 2.6 ?! References: <200401041242.47410.kernel@kolivas.org> <200401040815.54655.kernel@kolivas.org> <20040103233518.GE3728@alpha.home.local> <200401041242.47410.kernel@kolivas.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20040104195316.02151e98@171.71.163.14> <3FF7DA24.40802@cyberone.com.au> <20040104120720.GA14497@alpha.home.local> In-Reply-To: <20040104120720.GA14497@alpha.home.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1107 Lines: 27 Willy Tarreau wrote: >Now testing Con's noint patch against 2.6.0. It returns somewhat simmilar >results to Nick's w29p2, and behaves normally. The only noticeable difference >is that a simple task like "while :; do :; done&" eats about 100ms each second, >so if you start 10 of these, you're able to type only once a second (tested). >But I understand that this 'dumbness' was exactly the goal of this patch. >I think that I'll try to use 2.6 + Nick's scheduler for some time on my >notebook to get an overall idea on how it behaves. > >BTW, Nick, does your patch rely on -mm1 exclusive features, or would it be >possible to back-port it to plain 2.6 ? > No, you should be able to port it to 2.6 quite easily if you just apply the scheduler patches from -mm1 to it first. I'll do a proper release in the next day or so and include patches for both trees. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/