Received: by 2002:ac0:98c7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g7-v6csp3645870imd; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:09:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5c70aQxzJZdJbakPTKCpkHyacTFYin/eqNkMy4bXy4p/8Sf8R8wxb49cbjC9bNhdq7GRqf9 X-Received: by 2002:a62:6c49:: with SMTP id h70-v6mr16545607pfc.134.1540832949200; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:09:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1540832949; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ueBF7fxIdhF9jwhAAMv9l4ggetJkjXYZ4Gdn3qyWy6gAOgP51hwB0xh8hJQVm/lJ8D dXDghq0zEoHtcFAUTN7P5VH9gRDX5NPvm1GAivIKaqG363p748mudKAKmYoQkx7gYaEA 8cygSBsT6JGeYyxZnicBJDBjoNpxQWNGpDVHj3WA1MNRYDUaA0UgbDdOHEKm6oIAEay7 3MWSalJqyGT8vPOv6Z2Oify+AfOPWxtmxFv1AVRABNhxKvvJRmstC1r+uFur3fWTt1cG Svf+/lJxEmNi88bkcGb8t77bxYq02+THcCfcnXPGT+6l9ql8XmJ3LO4hiacCKkzjYyHf o/LA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=wpx4YoTI8yB11SI811XebhNiRNBhGZLwD4aFGCpBjDU=; b=iO7tLk9aAr3nJaPX3t3jDZoLNGqIociIRZ5RAreHbccuGr8YPcjYbVZQrxjt83MyLt pwSFCuR3dBFu71/RQ5VmH9MXyjWfbmeR7T1mz3jkNod9Bos1hEcQujBvYg6/5+79wJJb rKCaQox3mEKsn7Z7AlKO0+4tvn4HGzs+xDTKv6GlE04HVjytgJFK8J+PGbLsB1HI0jEA zb/38gTO/2mJx3CVTucw3XRXQyZGZrdCV/2/j9g03Vryr9LKklZ3b3oI8DsdjqdWrA0H yyYndD6BvXEwh5yy5NueEuSpzqBK/91SO1eJf/YfWiO1Fr8d7wHUJu4ZgjldwGHrO2rL o4QQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a23-v6si21024776pgg.372.2018.10.29.10.08.53; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:09:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726476AbeJ3B56 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 21:57:58 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:52386 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725920AbeJ3B55 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Oct 2018 21:57:57 -0400 Received: from tmo-115-37.customers.d1-online.com ([80.187.115.37] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1gHB1e-0007YR-U6; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:08:27 +0100 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:08:26 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Jens Axboe cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] irq: add support for allocating (and affinitizing) sets of IRQs In-Reply-To: <20181029163738.10172-12-axboe@kernel.dk> Message-ID: References: <20181029163738.10172-1-axboe@kernel.dk> <20181029163738.10172-12-axboe@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jens, On Mon, 29 Oct 2018, Jens Axboe wrote: > A driver may have a need to allocate multiple sets of MSI/MSI-X > interrupts, and have them appropriately affinitized. Add support for > defining a number of sets in the irq_affinity structure, of varying > sizes, and get each set affinitized correctly across the machine. > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe This looks good. Vs. merge logistics: I'm expecting some other changes in that area as per discussion with megasas (IIRC) folks. So I'd like to apply that myself right after -rc1 and provide it to you as a single commit to pull from so we can avoid collisions in next and the merge window. Thanks, tglx