Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 14:07:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 14:07:04 -0500 Received: from laird.ocp.internap.com ([64.94.114.35]:10278 "EHLO laird.ocp.internap.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 14:06:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 11:05:37 -0800 (PST) From: Scott Laird X-X-Sender: To: Matthew Wilcox cc: Andreas Dilger , LA Walsh , , Subject: Re: 64-bit block sizes on 32-bit systems In-Reply-To: <20010326190945.I31126@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > people who can afford 2TB of disc can afford to buy a 64-bit processor. > Sort of. A back-of-the-envelope calculation shows that 2 TB is only 25 80GB IDE drives. Given 4 3ware 8-channel IDE controllers and a large enough case, you could probably build a cheap 2TB RAID0 array for ~$10k. You could do RAID5 for only slightly more. While this isn't exactly a standard, off-the-shelf, general-purpose sort of configuration, it definately has its uses. Be careful assuming that huge amounts of disk storage requires a huge amount of money, or a high level of reliability or performance. Scott - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/