Received: by 2002:ac0:98c7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g7-v6csp4413617imd; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 01:16:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5c060FqjfUKu+N4Knwmtbj6UgXcimag+AE6FocqiBkKdAfasCeKBr3DS1/Tvhq7CmlxPuU5 X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9004:: with SMTP id a4-v6mr17636472plp.334.1540887379811; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 01:16:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1540887379; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CQScTn+VtFcrbqEVli3XSJCiem6AlP8RbTszK308xYa9OqODhQJ0MnFjS8ETVb7+sC +wvJuS1U6XJwmLnI0IR88txegKeL8IP5vXEz5nveCAXIuYC5/Akj87+YjD87MsT2hia5 ts/u2Avvof+WegKVJni+YKMEkvH1pbx8N6781dDItnEGFgucr83V1EkA4NlnzunWR8F1 u4ZkWqc7RYjDLM75ogUi6jY5i4Ivi+BlKGk3G1lS+O8NHYgiVDJLR7gbgeJZuZM/Y4YP 7WUM4iZxN+YJ77vne9R4NOQaXouRDuFrPhXetDlTLfAOdEubUslOOyuunNRM8TEogEjy xftw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=YPlbmlAxOPMb6g7IklVwAQP3D2fSlxLo+Bqpafn5/Ek=; b=itydMDNGvRNQUszjFBu95qxfZqgG9/oV32OR+bOPuMt0BSWTM6FT+Nit/RXzN/bjwL xkB/JuraIJ/o8EE6Nmc3EjLK2tCmGI+afhW4aAkGyjgWWBNpM8C5XzJsl5fFUjRyoCqA l5tVNi4FaJ2fZZUJlG4YEobs4MTv0fpd7XktnauhvJhQgLbeuLwQgxOzUcHAn4CN5z02 5oepd3z+Kms+IG5YP8mnnxYowLo+IJnE6Oj8mXba/DnGBgrUiiCMk4fCDQGjo66AgV/+ ZQCSLFjdLtgQ3zipMSzyRbE3qNAaXgRCGpC+Zy9j1rAuM9eJs27Rt8dSHHAbMuqoTzNl QnOw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k3-v6si18014992pld.25.2018.10.30.01.16.03; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 01:16:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726686AbeJ3RIF (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:08:05 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:35512 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726247AbeJ3RIF (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 13:08:05 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF4EAF3F; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 08:15:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 09:15:37 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Miles Chen Cc: Andrew Morton , Joe Perches , Matthew Wilcox , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, wsd_upstream@mediatek.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/page_owner: use kvmalloc instead of kmalloc Message-ID: <20181030081537.GV32673@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1540790176-32339-1-git-send-email-miles.chen@mediatek.com> <20181029080708.GA32673@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20181029081706.GC32673@dhcp22.suse.cz> <1540862950.12374.40.camel@mtkswgap22> <20181030060601.GR32673@dhcp22.suse.cz> <1540882551.23278.12.camel@mtkswgap22> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1540882551.23278.12.camel@mtkswgap22> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue 30-10-18 14:55:51, Miles Chen wrote: [...] > It's a real problem when using page_owner. > I found this issue recently: I'm not able to read page_owner information > during a overnight test. (error: read failed: Out of memory). I replace > kmalloc() with vmalloc() and it worked well. Is this with trimming the allocation to a single page and doing shorter than requested reads? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs