Received: by 2002:ac0:98c7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g7-v6csp4752486imd; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 06:59:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eOvCmqzMFWrmxG9Ci3dn5O/WgzgjXiqRv2MR4H1edDKbj5HSu08rTYu34tPybBCF9CO1ZL X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:28a2:: with SMTP id f31-v6mr19002175plb.312.1540907977517; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 06:59:37 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1540907977; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=j735hvBnIPYLstTccdlkyWCUv+NZscA377BJbEWNmk/X1WA+3n1HLU2ML+NEgrIXe1 UeRpvPdPs7nAPmnuUFWWEbGb2Rb9M94mq8jiNQ8G5OsQCOTTMjFGmL4sw7twIK3/8U8H O62eYwJANR/+E+DdUPvEtvFx+ij361BMjBXPnCdv0ffgk1VKbeMKqUuNnpheNtQryy5t MmB1hC8I1uEdLauH7Q0qcdJ9w5LpJvH2Ieml5dGVMOBVidf2fWeQjDe8x1fs5wbH0zx8 KI2hpIpAJ5/H6yLPC6rJcbS+eweA/5xJaIBn7v0FE52ai1NJGO21I7Xo2H8APC0/tj1v TgFQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :references:subject:cc:to:mime-version:user-agent:from:date :message-id; bh=y1CFeGbb+Svj5v4uXAepmqtPVRiDLlsTKW9TreIEed0=; b=O9NiA9Yj4nzXjbgIrINq16EzdApU4fQWe8SgJpS79jGudGTbK6Xdm0peq0hX1N9i7o +1YewuBh5yQLAbrZga5QUZV+nOuI1ccAG8vBAmzCYYf7qjTQVdpNeTpLs34oEz9M6szf 76EtcE/vbm4B9FjXaxcbXXj8QMlUIssAyoec06iMbUscJ87tct+t6ZbBPvMYEelJDpCD zgUTUaZzI+4kprMxlw6yqfVJVecKJrORLx3qAtrJWHKf54ZC4hRIjly3kdXv+gn8FdgZ fqEs3YV/0EVZmsMg5OYc03xQGSlQqK0BmywdWlU6/EJZ1zx3OqkWmCgsBzDu2jZvKxJA 92Jw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k184si5644566pgd.342.2018.10.30.06.59.21; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 06:59:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728069AbeJ3WwZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:52:25 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:50444 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727576AbeJ3WwY (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:52:24 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 0EB2B25EC4505; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 21:58:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.29.68) by DGGEMS403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 21:58:43 +0800 Message-ID: <5BD86392.7070200@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 21:58:42 +0800 From: zhong jiang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Coddington , , , CC: , LKML , Subject: Re: [Qestion] Lots of memory leaks when mounting and unmounting nfs client to server continuously. References: <5BD85266.6000301@huawei.com> <1DEE371C-69EB-4D92-8F78-535AA5203007@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1DEE371C-69EB-4D92-8F78-535AA5203007@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.29.68] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2018/10/30 21:06, Benjamin Coddington wrote: > Hi zhong jiang, > > Try asking in linux-nfs.. but I'll also note that 3.10-stable may be missing a number of fixes to leaks in the NFS GSS code. > > I can see a more than a few fixes to memory leaks with: > git log --grep=leak --oneline net/sunrpc/auth_gss/ > Thanks for your reply. I has tested some of them in the upsteam as you have said. but It fails to solve the issue completely. hence, I turn to the relevant experts whether they have happened to the issue or can give some suggestion or not. Thanks, zhong jiang > Ben > > On 30 Oct 2018, at 8:45, zhong jiang wrote: > >> Hi, Herbert >> >> Recently, I hit a memory leak issue when mounting and unmounting nfs with the way of krb5. >> The issue happens to the linux-3.10-stable. >> >> I find that slab-1024 and slab-512 will take up most of the memory. And it can not be freed. >> Meanwhile, it result in rpcsec_gss_krb5 can be unregistered as well. >> >> nfs-sve1:/home # cat /proc/modules | grep krb5 >> rpcsec_gss_krb5 31477 239730 - Live 0xffffffffa0334000 >> auth_rpcgss 59314 3 rpcsec_gss_krb5,nfsd, Live 0xffffffffa0123000 >> sunrpc 300546 25 rpcsec_gss_krb5,nfsd,auth_rpcgss,nfs_acl,lockd, Live 0xffffffffa013b000 >> >> I open the slab-1024 trace by enabling /sys/kernel/slab/:t-0001024/trace and get the following >> >> [123420.989831] Call Trace: >> [123420.989834] [] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b >> [123420.989837] [] alloc_debug_processing+0xc5/0x118 >> [123420.989839] [] __slab_alloc+0x400/0x48f >> [123420.989841] [] ? __crypto_alloc_tfm+0x45/0x170 >> [123420.989845] [] ? setkey+0x57/0x110 >> [123420.989847] [] ? kzfree+0x2d/0x30 >> [123420.989850] [] __kmalloc+0x1c8/0x230 >> [123420.989852] [] __crypto_alloc_tfm+0x45/0x170 >> [123420.989854] [] crypto_spawn_tfm+0x45/0x80 >> [123420.989857] [] ? __kmalloc+0x1f3/0x230 >> [123420.989859] [] crypto_cbc_init_tfm+0x27/0x40 >> [123420.989864] [] __crypto_alloc_tfm+0x101/0x170 >> [123420.989866] [] crypto_alloc_base+0x4c/0xb0 >> [123420.989869] [] context_v2_alloc_cipher.isra.2+0x2b/0xc0 [rpcsec_gss_krb5] >> [123420.989871] [] gss_import_sec_context_kerberos+0xbf8/0xf00 [rpcsec_gss_krb5] >> [123420.989875] [] gss_import_sec_context+0x7d/0xb0 [auth_rpcgss] >> [123420.989878] [] gss_proxy_save_rsc+0x137/0x1b0 [auth_rpcgss] >> [123420.989884] [] svcauth_gss_proxy_init+0x147/0x1e4 [auth_rpcgss] >> [123420.989886] [] ? dequeue_entity+0x106/0x520 >> [123420.989890] [] svcauth_gss_accept+0x3da/0xb70 [auth_rpcgss] >> [123420.989892] [] ? check_preempt_curr+0x85/0xa0 >> [123420.989894] [] ? ttwu_do_wakeup+0x19/0xd0 >> [123420.989897] [] ? ttwu_do_activate.constprop.86+0x5d/0x70 >> [123420.989900] [] ? try_to_wake_up+0x162/0x330 >> [123420.989908] [] svc_authenticate+0xc0/0xe0 [sunrpc] >> [123420.989914] [] svc_process_common+0x21a/0x6f0 [sunrpc] >> [123420.989921] [] svc_process+0x103/0x170 [sunrpc] >> [123420.989928] [] nfsd+0xdf/0x150 [nfsd] >> [123420.989932] [] ? nfsd_destroy+0x80/0x80 [nfsd] >> [123420.989934] [] kthread+0xcf/0xe0 >> [123420.989936] [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140 >> [123420.989939] [] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90 >> [123420.989943] [] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140 >> >> I am unfamiliar with crypto. I will be appreciated if you could give me some suggestion. >> >> Thanks, >> zhong jiang > > . >