Received: by 2002:ac0:98c7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g7-v6csp5348810imd; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 16:20:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5czQVNUYVrPCHiaRlLMvJt2lJT5/gVvPYXtgKqA4j/ylGislM5zuJFiEzD5miiBxWq/qr4V X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8195:: with SMTP id g21-v6mr721049pfi.71.1540941629558; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 16:20:29 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1540941629; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WikHMWKTL3Y45mb8E6Ud8UpfI2G0w1K3IZGiQzQKo5ovLRIFRJs2+it7N3x64aWU51 CGrPhsM6v6zfHym9moGmCMJgli5Gf5a7I5qAmFK8PaaZnlpgv8hi6sHYnhgdv1r9UM6V aTCvHZ+GNL8LWPCdk9SnL5/ZzJ5BU1yWATryg1GmGrrjDl5B/8t542vcZALRn+kmCJpy ya1i4Zi2pnei5svmFoHyERIkuwhGexo1nG/tdj+DDy0dV+p/KShcXveUEHMslNcl4+3W yHxuCwkYZwWbd2NhxrIjRrEoV0isFBsF5H1niiJ2YGCVrqETu1GVXs9bHMJsWIEU5t50 vyrA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=b83ty+tbJ6ULqZevkxoqWmH70KaxHVdrjE3Ot1LuxBU=; b=shxj/K4MU66ERahTmGC5PSfKBeXVCuVm/RpnfAWlBL2Sagt5XPKeHa6uG2lSwMN2OX bI0kdgBqd3vA/s8Di97DeZ2oNEQSvYhADS7y3wOwc2Vkq2hOTBAjLyP3x6+Q4DDfnnpC ISMCYNQmlnW7r4bRJKLbmWMyyOhAar6wtlluNiK1iOKW1YuS9dsLHf5NkBWy8a/ZOSPh jupyb65ftR57oxR4sxeaPWmt1ORfVxZEZxrnIJXMY0Ggtnh6Vl365rU0txxDJMhbBbYz c/hehe2sqjI4Wov/osapo3n2CfKLV59tLHwPt64NMWFyMsib/9NcIlNjhm0nSp2ijZCu a7sg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a66-v6si16912494pfb.22.2018.10.30.16.20.14; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 16:20:29 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728604AbeJaIKq (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 31 Oct 2018 04:10:46 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48082 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727739AbeJaIKq (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2018 04:10:46 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F65DAF8A; Tue, 30 Oct 2018 23:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 16:15:06 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Vito Caputo Cc: Waiman Long , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/proc: introduce /proc/stat2 file Message-ID: <20181030231506.fy3oix75rifimevv@linux-r8p5> References: <20181029192521.23059-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <0afed890-7c5a-93ee-cdb9-e30775bd9cf1@redhat.com> <20181029200050.iejuxckzbm742dmw@linux-r8p5> <3c5ba85b-5114-c751-0114-ac2cb64c02ea@redhat.com> <20181029203818.pot26ewxbncfrnua@linux-r8p5> <20181029212314.nwruqg6au23ebqlu@shells.gnugeneration.com> <20181030185756.w3f2trelb7nikgmk@linux-r8p5> <20181030224012.mgatj7ddhj3sefkv@shells.gnugeneration.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181030224012.mgatj7ddhj3sefkv@shells.gnugeneration.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180323 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 30 Oct 2018, Vito Caputo wrote: >If you create /proc/stat2 to omit interrupts, do we then create >/proc/stat3 to omit CPUs when just interrupts are of interest to the >application running on a 256-cpu machine? Be real, this is a bogus argument. As mentioned, stat2 is named as such because it's a replacement for a better common case, not some random increment. Thanks, Davidlohr