Received: by 2002:ac0:98c7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g7-v6csp5709534imd; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:21:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5evvYi9Ja/c5pHWKmqRA1rgOrcLSPs0NzVemZg+M0cdIz559t7gfDXnIjIj51icMRQkNlFy X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:32a4:: with SMTP id z33-v6mr2126893plb.85.1540970517477; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:21:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1540970517; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CoAlc/gbSA81J/53Ms7HssYGs6b9lsrI6d/ZsKK4lt27LAlHmYE3J2eo0remHqPCCX LqBRyRMEstCZoujjkEfK6F5Lr3RadNEsXzaFMrExkbY7PVUIrUOgTc9M3UEwhKk9sirn luocJUc5eLysWC6m2XjMvdZLJC37YfnhKaZbndYamYv0TnCkc8Y9nDND9/5YnyVqoxO/ HJkVKlSjqu51vu6hgK1ClpvuZTZnooD9cAoyGgXqr591rgaApDtIPoKdTz+f2e5bO0eI AZgusL8ph81w+q5iXQdgPx0N5M1vDGj2HMT6e6lqjeBvbK8rialgYEfO2ZGk92COz7PE bXrA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=fMXKX8lzzJ1GUrXN3mYmPqalfU6xnA7W+kWjuQVX5Fo=; b=eBIIyO32CWMK5RU9E+ZifjaVRa2dffebZpar9lKwkiMx89xvlVByyyTFkdpqZjoHv9 USzCteRr6c7C3qwVHmb+vGdgfdh7XVzW0Yalik6UfT3wh5kFuQKuV7yIpYOGi4pEhQFT HhEdcr/mcuizaKq5aAU1JQO8012LOpcbqkJjLpbSTDcwaKiCAx3qq6dnssnhKA6G9leW zlWQiSlsKHINA4xHOhtGJXoHodCyKYQm+DRmexIG+THDI11EPPFnMegSCcTromS+1ZAv psLCehgJ430xC36YS6GRnyZTjHR+UJwe0z9ru8lLBmhzrv6qwAwPFvbu6fENfX1sNF9P iAjw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h14-v6si20990530pgv.260.2018.10.31.00.21.27; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726858AbeJaQRn (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 31 Oct 2018 12:17:43 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:36570 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726097AbeJaQRn (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Oct 2018 12:17:43 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F4C80D; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:20:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (e107985-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.38]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 716323F557; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 00:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] sched/fair: update scale invariance of PELT To: Vincent Guittot , peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@arm.com, pjt@google.com, bsegall@google.com, thara.gopinath@linaro.org, pkondeti@codeaurora.org References: <1540570303-6097-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1540570303-6097-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> From: Dietmar Eggemann Message-ID: <6d0b324e-5e26-a510-9bcd-97f475e515ed@arm.com> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 08:20:44 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1540570303-6097-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/26/18 6:11 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: [...] > static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int cpu); > static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p); > @@ -764,7 +763,7 @@ void post_init_entity_util_avg(struct sched_entity *se) > * such that the next switched_to_fair() has the > * expected state. > */ > - se->avg.last_update_time = cfs_rq_clock_task(cfs_rq); > + se->avg.last_update_time = cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq); > return; > } > } There is this 1/cpu scaling of se->avg.util_sum (running_sum) in update_tg_cfs_runnable() so it can be used to calculate se->avg.runnable_load_sum (runnable_sum). I guess with your approach this should be removed. > @@ -3466,7 +3465,7 @@ static void detach_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *s > /* Update task and its cfs_rq load average */ > static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags) > { > - u64 now = cfs_rq_clock_task(cfs_rq); > + u64 now = cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq); > struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq); > int cpu = cpu_of(rq); > int decayed; > @@ -6694,6 +6693,12 @@ done: __maybe_unused; > if (new_tasks > 0) > goto again; > > + /* > + * rq is about to be idle, check if we need to update the > + * lost_idle_time of clock_pelt > + */ > + update_idle_rq_clock_pelt(rq); > + > return NULL; > } [...]