Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20181025183739.9375-1-robert.foss@collabora.com> <20181025183739.9375-4-robert.foss@collabora.com>
In-Reply-To: <20181025183739.9375-4-robert.foss@collabora.com>
From:   Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 31 Oct 2018 09:38:56 +0000
Message-ID: <CACvgo51EXugYmNamgUKzyaYbk_kEyODNbG10AJtkvhbQgYwxWw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/virtio: add in-fences support for explicit synchronization
To:     Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
        ML dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        "open list:VIRTIO GPU DRIVER" 
        <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
        "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.com>,
        Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Rob,

On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 19:38, Robert Foss <robert.foss@collabora.com> wrote:

> @@ -124,6 +127,22 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>         if ((exbuf->flags & ~VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FLAGS))
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> +       if (exbuf->flags & VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN) {
> +               in_fence = sync_file_get_fence(in_fence_fd);
> +               if (!in_fence)
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +
> +               /*
> +                * Wait if the fence is from a foreign context, or if the fence
> +                * array contains any fence from a foreign context.
> +                */
> +               if (!dma_fence_match_context(in_fence, vgdev->fence_drv.context)) {
> +                       ret = dma_fence_wait(in_fence, true);
> +                       if (ret)
> +                               return ret;
Aren't we missing dma_fence_put() before the return here?

With that
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@collabora.com>

-Emil