Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265165AbUAEQsf (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:48:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265168AbUAEQsf (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:48:35 -0500 Received: from websrv.werbeagentur-aufwind.de ([213.239.197.241]:2493 "EHLO mail.werbeagentur-aufwind.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265165AbUAEQsa (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:48:30 -0500 Subject: Re: Possibly wrong BIO usage in ide_multwrite From: Christophe Saout To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200401051712.41695.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> References: <1072977507.4170.14.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <200401032302.32914.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> <1073237458.6069.31.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <200401051712.41695.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1073321295.7121.8.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 17:48:15 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1847 Lines: 42 Am Mo, den 05.01.2004 schrieb Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz um 17:12: > > The IDE_TASKFILE_IO gets things right (from my point of view) and is > > also much cleaner. (I would personally vote for dropping the non > > TASKFILE_IO code, it would make my problem go away :D - why is it still > > marked as experimental BTW? I've been using it since it was introduced, > > without any problems) > > There are still some issues to be resolved: > - hangs during reading /proc/ide//identify on some drives > (workaround is now known thanks to debugging done by Andi+BenH+Andre) > - unexplained fs corruption on x86-64 with AMD IDE chipsets > (the real showstopper) > - somebody needs to test taskfile code on old Promise PDC4030 controller > (low priority) Unexplained corruptions. Coder's nightmare. ;) Yes, that's always really bad. Unfortunately I don't have such a machine so I can't help trying to nail it down. > > Perhaps I can think of something else. It's really tricky... > > I would like to remove non CONFIG_IDE_TASKFILE_IO paths in 2.6.x > (after issues are resolved) instead of trying to fix them. Sure, we agree on that point. I think everyone does. BTW, I've found a not too complicated workaround for my particular original problem so the bi_idx issue isn't a showstopper for my device-mapper target. But apart from that the rewinding bi_idx to zero thing still gives me headaches just being there. A small non-invasive workaround won't make it much worse, it's hopefully going to die anyway. Thanks for being patient with me. :-) (and not raising new paranoia theories ;-)) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/