Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 31 Oct 2018 18:19:35 -0300
From:   Shayenne Moura <shayenneluzmoura@gmail.com>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH] drm: Rename crtc_idr as object_idr to
 KMS cleanups
Message-ID: <20181031211935.p2pxr7fh26m5dc7v@smtp.gmail.com>
References: <20181031205737.cingeaqget7hkbs6@smtp.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1810312200520.2391@hadrien>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1810312200520.2391@hadrien>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 10/31, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> 
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Shayenne da Luz Moura wrote:
> 
> > Rename 'drm_mode_config.crtc_idr' as 'drm_mode_config.object_idr',
> > as proposed in the task description in TODO list for KMS cleanups.
> 
> Is object_idr a field that already exists?  If so, "Rename" is not the
> best choice of words.  It should be something like "use the object_idr
> field instead of the crtc_idr field" and then explain why.  "task
> description in TODO list for KMS cleanups" isn't very helpful to
> understand why the change should be made.
>
> julia

Hi Julia,

Thank you for your review!

This patch is to solve this TODO task:
 drm_mode_config.crtc_idr is misnamed, since it contains all KMS object. 
 Should be renamed to drm_mode_config.object_idr.

Do you think I need to use this description in my commit message?

Best,
Shayenne