Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:16:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:16:33 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:33804 "HELO postfix.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:16:24 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:05:21 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel To: James Antill Cc: Guest section DW , Alan Cox , Stephen Clouse , "Patrick O'Rourke" , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent OOM from killing init In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 26 Mar 2001, James Antill wrote: > If you want overcommit great, and I think it's a valid default > ... but it'd be nice if I could say I don't want it for apps that > aren't written using glib etc. Agreed. Jonathan Morton seems to be making progress in testing and debugging the non-overcommit patch from some time ago. If things turn out to be trivial enough I wouldn't be surprised if we got to see the option of non-overcommit somewhere in future 2.4 and 2.5 kernels... regards, Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/