Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S265230AbUAETF3 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 14:05:29 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265252AbUAETF3
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 14:05:29 -0500
Received: from kiuru.kpnet.fi ([193.184.122.21]:21685 "EHLO kiuru.kpnet.fi")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265230AbUAETEx (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 5 Jan 2004 14:04:53 -0500
Subject: Re: 2.6.1-rc1 affected?
From: Markus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=E4stbacka?= <midian@ihme.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401051027430.2115@home.osdl.org>
References: <1073320318.21198.2.camel@midux>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401050840290.21265@home.osdl.org>
	 <1073326471.21338.21.camel@midux>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401051027430.2115@home.osdl.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-BZvvFsNbbb/UsS5lJYUf"
Message-Id: <1073329487.21682.17.camel@midux>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 21:04:47 +0200
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1784
Lines: 51


--=-BZvvFsNbbb/UsS5lJYUf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 20:31, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Because nobody actually contacted me about the problem and I read about i=
t
> on linux-kernel like everybody else? Because I just got up and created th=
e
> patch? And because nobody has an exploit yet, and one may be hard or
> impossible to create? And because people who care about these things tend
> to not update to x.0 kernels anyway?
>=20
Ok, I see your point. though, even that I care about these things, I
updated one of my servers to development tree somewhere at 2.5.70~.
The reason for me was the major performance difference.
> > But I think there's corporations who use 2.6.0 and don't read the lkml.
>=20
> They'll get a 2.6.1 soonish. The patch is in the current BK tree, will be=
=20
> in -rc2, and will be in 2.6.1. Let's just make sure we don't screw up the=
=20
> release due to being too much in a hurry either..
>=20
Yes, better give it time and not rush.

Thanks for your time.
--=20
"Software is like sex, it's better when it's free."
Markus H=E4stbacka <midian at ihme dot org>

--=-BZvvFsNbbb/UsS5lJYUf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/+bVP3+NhIWS1JHARAkoEAKDvNRrgP64m2cpY42CLnix2mnCGmgCfQqRD
mTEz/VlOGvtG2kJ5xWob7J0=
=HucE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-BZvvFsNbbb/UsS5lJYUf--

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/