Received: by 2002:ac0:98c7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g7-v6csp830220imd; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 06:18:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5f5JwUBN0F069I6qWbmdscFdZe0xU7OVdQSlja3LecR4BSgYesdpwEn6Jy3pmybjOEfeI1G X-Received: by 2002:a62:2741:: with SMTP id n62-v6mr7827878pfn.138.1541078315914; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 06:18:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1541078315; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bBJj0RF1BA5fI6C84UUZwsFrGbxe0935NlWsBRndNtU4vrpd8Tz6k35W2LM3EQRXIx sqEzHmxFFh30Xq86yH4XP67QJPkPnX7FlYtaMgeTxhIX7vYl37fKULOkxT6XtR4d744x dBr7+DsyoRXGeplYLelVz8sgoawYYdLAZpNYTp0WaxAYhM2pZCftwN7FpqG93w3NZIkl G56jSz8grv3XrcBfsrFBTHjyo6lJuKYcuY9AdbkNU+rj80zGeBE12R9t0uBQd5S1NLQA Lej4C/16TB9cnvItLzMVxgcsugS+vD+JXPSH2hJhpJAWm8Z5yECw1Eei64E7k5fYSzPY UJtg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=G9tYNOy8A1JmfQ+uK3UTsREkQDNtiGic6yQkg/dtLJw=; b=cU173ti6Qn0bmMArWSuRklkIJJeFjbL+MfSzy8TjdBnNjEGLiAQmLf/Cea09L7GOet sEI2EudsToeiRF1/t9YBsNOfv3AmBek6TjlxysFXVUwqVozkZifvMiDsDOkaQmKwoEr6 ZS9usya3IGu14VPZbgAUDhDCrf2FXAmOgX82+wefNUFLXX2uOnKUQ99n+PXp2U89Rnxp pi8zyQYUovEpLTf/MHf2twqcO79V21ooQnFaLnSNqhvw7hi1/hprn5BOnOkDxCJE9qiM ST0XGqps4hgUHm18XqyrCCIJRFXL1pkW1CYyBb9lSxrD6wbmhEAEVylxYXyahjB2PEWw rxKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j3-v6si29305190pld.231.2018.11.01.06.18.17; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 06:18:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728527AbeKAWUf (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Nov 2018 18:20:35 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:57497 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727644AbeKAWUf (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2018 18:20:35 -0400 Received: from p5492fe24.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([84.146.254.36] helo=nanos) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1gICqm-0004HB-H5; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 14:17:28 +0100 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 14:17:27 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Eial Czerwacki cc: Randy Dunlap , "Shai Fultheim (Shai@ScaleMP.com)" , Andrew Morton , "broonie@kernel.org" , "mhocko@suse.cz" , Stephen Rothwell , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , LKML , "mm-commits@vger.kernel.org" , X86 ML , 'Oren Twaig' Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/build: Build VSMP support only if selected In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20181030230905.xHZmM%akpm@linux-foundation.org> <9e14d183-55a4-8299-7a18-0404e50bf004@infradead.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 1 Nov 2018, Eial Czerwacki wrote: > Greetings, > > On 11/01/2018 12:39 PM, Shai Fultheim (Shai@ScaleMP.com) wrote: > > On 01/11/18 11:37, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > >> VSMP support is built even if CONFIG_X86_VSMP is not set. This leads to a build > >> breakage when CONFIG_PCI is disabled as well. > >> > >> Build VSMP code only when selected. > > > > This patch disables detect_vsmp_box() on systems without CONFIG_X86_VSMP, due to > > the recent 6da63eb241a05b0e676d68975e793c0521387141. This is significant > > regression that will affect significant number of deployments. > > > > We will reply shortly with an updated patch that fix the dependency on pv_irq_ops, > > and revert to CONFIG_PARAVIRT, with proper protection for CONFIG_PCI. > > > > here is the proper patch which fixes the issue on hand: > >From ebff534f8cfa55d7c3ab798c44abe879f3fbe2b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Eial Czerwacki > Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 15:08:32 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] x86/build: Build VSMP support only if CONFIG_PCI is > selected > > vsmp dependency of pv_irq_ops removed some years ago, so now let's clean > it up from vsmp_64.c. > > In short, "cap & ctl & (1 << 4)" was always returning 0, as such we can > remove all the PARAVIRT/PARAVIRT_XXL code handling that. > > However, the rest of the code depends on CONFIG_PCI, so fix it accordingly. > > Signed-off-by: Eial Czerwacki > Acked-by: Shai Fultheim Nice cleanup! Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner