Received: by 2002:ac0:98c7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g7-v6csp1078038imd; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 09:53:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fXqt5Gr4e1ptvM5H5Z4gfWObNpOfCJsQQOpETKZKFe3bkH+PoZ5d9KPxmx6kKtzN90uH/O X-Received: by 2002:a65:42c2:: with SMTP id l2-v6mr7475081pgp.139.1541091211618; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 09:53:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1541091211; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KwfP1vKbM9IgRqmcYFkusn4lGrFoRq23H9ouTrOgezTbfNgWQL2W/tMg/ViGxeZE0K 6ztjoPnxEiX8+tA6/t+5efbS/0BDg2MYORQn2g58Hxg8d+NMhycecUzpgSxmgYCwoMIB jtGsqYxZKsJltKKP74rXZSLK5Izkf/eCRReJXKCd8p3ibnBCTA6LIa+yM+Bnc0mVhSXd 0UTVwGNgJO0N7ZT4RG+Cr0PTpDpjkhcKowdaVxVn8zN+s3Ljsx2HIF5sEQ+toLnOLDY7 TvKjeLTlYotO3l+AtIjSl/ioATUKC3tvgW9TvHYkkvEdFtOXvaCj+dXHTPXVbDytayHi TOEw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=W4Oih5BlRuZ5T2UzDWsJfX69B78JE+wEYoHrPjVo9UE=; b=kjBpYJw2eahyW5/l751BP9aUlAB9ctXrqD7NDQX9MpGzvuTZHGJl1F9TQQTG5WKDRC LObQQPuMGhD4KKno6D+gCoWXKQbCP/lWBBPLeYhVgRSemJsyVhT0uBLveHePooKduKV9 ZBJZ3Ixl+jBp1akoRXWBk8NbtpHEiJfgsUSYko3QP3f5t17Rwx4HmMr4V0L7Sgjn5EPK Nkc5kdgq931Srj/eEt2Mc4M+Db6bw+7Eq9M6xDGgZ9Ib2cNVCOuUUvQcKJqHPqvHpxKq HJdrs/X1G0qrtukmYVLiTZ5Mcdt/MkZrrrLfOsKEtYDqbaZY68/nOLw8P0en62xy+Dys ySgw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q129-v6si30760261pga.96.2018.11.01.09.53.16; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 09:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727377AbeKBBzL (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Nov 2018 21:55:11 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:53168 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726265AbeKBBzL (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2018 21:55:11 -0400 Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gIGBm-0006Oy-0k; Thu, 01 Nov 2018 16:51:22 +0000 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 16:51:21 +0000 From: Al Viro To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [git pull] mount API series Message-ID: <20181101165121.GS32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20181031053355.GQ32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87a7mut9cm.fsf@xmission.com> <20181031163601.GR32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181031163601.GR32577@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 04:36:01PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:38:17AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > A couple of bugs that I can see quickly. Several of which I have > > previously reported: > > > > - There is an easily triggered NULL pointer deference with open_tree > > and mount propagation. > > What the hell? If the fixes that went in do not handle something, > especially if you have testcases, where the fuck have you been and > where _are_ those testcases, while we are at it? > > Eric, this is bloody ridiculous - "I have an easily triggered NULL pointer > dereference in..., here it is" is hard to miscommunicate. Sure, any such > needs to be fixed. For crying out loud, that thing has not been hidden - > it sat in -next, it's been reposted several times... Again, would you mind telling what exactly does the above refer to and whether it is still true? I'm not asking to put details in every time you mention something of that sort, but generally one is expected to come up with those on demand, especially if the bug _is_ easily triggered. You, IIRC, had been Cc'd on the threads where open_tree breakage was dealt with. I can certainly believe that there might be something else in that area (or any other, for that matter). I *am* interested in finding and fixing that and I would rather appreciate the details of what you are seeing.