Received: by 2002:ac0:98c7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g7-v6csp2204394imd; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 07:38:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cd2Jzth4xNWKW2vng7sx7v/XnFJbp6ZdIEdsqejP5EiXxESmDaiAZD+ER/eh1rp3JJfBoa X-Received: by 2002:a63:f74f:: with SMTP id f15mr11301994pgk.190.1541169497014; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 07:38:17 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1541169496; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jwLC4RzoCU2BuHAUMhjhiG5lFlJ+sy1g9Ebr5L4BN9e8MciVFNrrTT31kL8dqwQOHl 02OSEfYFmfrSWmHbAzHllkMlk+EL2axAHodA1e/Jk69AbB+D72YzBQM/b5mMmMwewlme jFd3G8efs0Ud4vZ3NCdZQVrRcf6j5xwqRtNKszJHgIYUJctPJtdacEkd4s0Maq9YlkRu nL36E8fagPUfDXBYs7FgTwAF2u1TjuoY+WF//s/MneZeZF1BRUsfdK0kuKGRsDIFyez2 JVk8YRbC1Owgm4mvXwYpbdVwe6IcYDCD1mRplJ4PzBo/CKwq3pWy5VN+TtjZ5fku/1w+ mw3g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=+nIsK+ZlwI+lvNPbCyXAG4CJnaR9dAieef+BgoPNLpg=; b=p2g/KwgtrMHxJVOnP4tgJ0KFjV5GlDhB5KpTld+mBaUTEQIbrWQ3OLsyGYUvOSdgD2 WAh8O32fYdr5HWPOAu10qqmHZVFX4rinWZgInGUENBsuXFSBktnpVNot+VI367EB5ezA 0vJdplxRAUaNqtMPxvdLtyFYsYE/iGOhi1MSczFABYOmkRATc6ys+MfnQeCjrrShXr+t QrcdKU3tTC2bxrcJPvUZfbFjbTSAJ1vf1eMYulRVup2WQmjTibak3hff4avF5ZOv2Wqb Xhu1+IqdngIqxPCjxlCXy4BvSox0yjgD0rO0iPleS9bAGowVtJgtY0QyUDBfEYbiPh1e KIvw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f7-v6si31657172pgh.159.2018.11.02.07.38.01; Fri, 02 Nov 2018 07:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727969AbeKBXoh (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 2 Nov 2018 19:44:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43611 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727808AbeKBXoh (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2018 19:44:37 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C35958E3E; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 14:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ming.t460p (ovpn-8-27.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.8.27]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DC185D9C9; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 14:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 22:37:07 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] irq: add support for allocating (and affinitizing) sets of IRQs Message-ID: <20181102143707.GA31121@ming.t460p> References: <20181030183252.17857-1-axboe@kernel.dk> <20181030183252.17857-14-axboe@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181030183252.17857-14-axboe@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Fri, 02 Nov 2018 14:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:32:49PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > A driver may have a need to allocate multiple sets of MSI/MSI-X > interrupts, and have them appropriately affinitized. Add support for > defining a number of sets in the irq_affinity structure, of varying > sizes, and get each set affinitized correctly across the machine. > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke > Reviewed-by: Ming Lei > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe > --- > drivers/pci/msi.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > include/linux/interrupt.h | 4 ++++ > kernel/irq/affinity.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c > index af24ed50a245..e6c6e10b9ceb 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c > @@ -1036,6 +1036,13 @@ static int __pci_enable_msi_range(struct pci_dev *dev, int minvec, int maxvec, > if (maxvec < minvec) > return -ERANGE; > > + /* > + * If the caller is passing in sets, we can't support a range of > + * vectors. The caller needs to handle that. > + */ > + if (affd->nr_sets && minvec != maxvec) > + return -EINVAL; > + > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dev->msi_enabled)) > return -EINVAL; > > @@ -1087,6 +1094,13 @@ static int __pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_dev *dev, > if (maxvec < minvec) > return -ERANGE; > > + /* > + * If the caller is passing in sets, we can't support a range of > + * supported vectors. The caller needs to handle that. > + */ > + if (affd->nr_sets && minvec != maxvec) > + return -EINVAL; > + > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dev->msix_enabled)) > return -EINVAL; > > diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h > index 1d6711c28271..ca397ff40836 100644 > --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h > +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h > @@ -247,10 +247,14 @@ struct irq_affinity_notify { > * the MSI(-X) vector space > * @post_vectors: Don't apply affinity to @post_vectors at end of > * the MSI(-X) vector space > + * @nr_sets: Length of passed in *sets array > + * @sets: Number of affinitized sets > */ > struct irq_affinity { > int pre_vectors; > int post_vectors; > + int nr_sets; > + int *sets; > }; > > #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) > diff --git a/kernel/irq/affinity.c b/kernel/irq/affinity.c > index f4f29b9d90ee..2046a0f0f0f1 100644 > --- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c > +++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c > @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd) > int curvec, usedvecs; > cpumask_var_t nmsk, npresmsk, *node_to_cpumask; > struct cpumask *masks = NULL; > + int i, nr_sets; > > /* > * If there aren't any vectors left after applying the pre/post > @@ -210,10 +211,23 @@ irq_create_affinity_masks(int nvecs, const struct irq_affinity *affd) > get_online_cpus(); > build_node_to_cpumask(node_to_cpumask); > > - /* Spread on present CPUs starting from affd->pre_vectors */ > - usedvecs = irq_build_affinity_masks(affd, curvec, affvecs, > - node_to_cpumask, cpu_present_mask, > - nmsk, masks); > + /* > + * Spread on present CPUs starting from affd->pre_vectors. If we > + * have multiple sets, build each sets affinity mask separately. > + */ > + nr_sets = affd->nr_sets; > + if (!nr_sets) > + nr_sets = 1; > + > + for (i = 0, usedvecs = 0; i < nr_sets; i++) { > + int this_vecs = affd->sets ? affd->sets[i] : affvecs; > + int nr; > + > + nr = irq_build_affinity_masks(affd, curvec, this_vecs, > + node_to_cpumask, cpu_present_mask, > + nmsk, masks + usedvecs); The last parameter of the above function should have been 'masks', because irq_build_affinity_masks() always treats 'masks' as the base address of the array. > + usedvecs += nr; > + } Thinking of further, one big problem in this patch is that each set of IRQs should have been spread on all possible CPUs, which is done via 2-stages spread now. However, this patch only spreads each set of IRQs on present CPUs, this way may not work in case of physical CPU hotplug. Thanks, Ming