Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265252AbUAFCJK (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:09:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265255AbUAFCJK (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:09:10 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:5092 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265252AbUAFCJH (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:09:07 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:08:59 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jean-Marc Valin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@intel.com Subject: Re: ACPI battery problem with 2.6.1-rc1-mm2 kernel patch Message-Id: <20040105180859.7e20e87a.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1073354003.4101.11.camel@idefix.homelinux.org> References: <1073354003.4101.11.camel@idefix.homelinux.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 837 Lines: 23 Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > Hi, > > I've just tried 2.6.1-rc1-mm2 and noticed that I can no longer get the > battery status through ACPI (/proc/acpi/battery/BAT0/state reports only > zeros). While my dsdt may be a bit buggy, it worked fine with 2.6.1-rc1, > so there seems to be a regression somewhere. I haven't tried earlier -mm > patches though. > > I'm running Fedora Core 1 on Dell Latitute D600 (Pentium M 1.6, 1 GB > RAM). I can do more testing if that's useful. > Thanks, the acpi-20031203 patch seems to have introduced a handful of regressions. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/