Received: by 2002:ac0:98c7:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id g7-v6csp420196imd; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 03:11:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fUC9UnutI3t4B3onSjrZaNN9AnjOE0HB/8/181l6BSH6DU4ykOEIXFGrFDLku2p00UpwNF X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6b4b:: with SMTP id g11-v6mr14886436plt.213.1541239919507; Sat, 03 Nov 2018 03:11:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1541239919; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=r6PkdHFCKIIio3dhyo34dYWU21TNAP8Mw/f1VM6EtxgPO+zl91SywomCwNN69gSSWI y+5ySKuY215YMLZ1r51CZ071IBj5oYWT2629yYtAQ8KymJRIu8Iajl2BwLMQGJZo1MQH eSpLolXcTRV9RQWUPYFHcPn2v6WT4GMcTBJ9bHIb5Z+nzLS3jiBeWf9vC8dlfQZcBbp/ 6ZsmtqCwTMJz1D95NAlPeW4Nk7/wiujhpEW67DB5n4hYoDSU1c7uIwLGbMxxWbVfgF6D HospIZMAlT+oEBnP4f+XTbiO2ipIDjSLGaI/gLADBZXN99E3MlhVVMcOhxm6OPNZD3Cj 1NCQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=JAuMCYQWTgw8SrVC0eprlTg+o1MNmTySQFDWRWZwacI=; b=dg4HKCQmlRyAY+PNo0ZI0t+qcWXj20jFIJ3SmS1YEHPcYyx7CCh9qRBICQKBNPIl1q /Wt+YpsYqMhVEzeuV5BJBaaqb88odY/X9hyyRPFwRQ3aL7re2lbUYXnElkTCuM9psZEn G5XkBBx6fOjahBOEY5sOhLOnhijUDCNC96XxYOOZnr35y8qozU3fwyGOso9nV+HrU2eQ vLKi07r7zu73KKdrso8e+fBJZDHSjrfmGT8ltmy1oCEgKqvXyR+G5Z30ULNzP2Jkp6iQ wZJ+GgRrkgK9YZa3dd+gyZXK7w+NECmz9CBDSOBGfZpIbRwJ619o+5tLktWL4CVYH/Ai Z4TQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i12-v6si29621446pgl.83.2018.11.03.03.11.45; Sat, 03 Nov 2018 03:11:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727879AbeKCTWL (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 3 Nov 2018 15:22:11 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50594 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726849AbeKCTWL (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Nov 2018 15:22:11 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC4FACFF; Sat, 3 Nov 2018 10:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2018 11:11:20 +0100 (CET) From: Jiri Kosina To: Nadav Amit cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Kees Cook , Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] Fix "x86/alternatives: Lockdep-enforce text_mutex in text_poke*()" In-Reply-To: <20181102232946.98461-2-namit@vmware.com> Message-ID: References: <20181102232946.98461-1-namit@vmware.com> <20181102232946.98461-2-namit@vmware.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LSU 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2 Nov 2018, Nadav Amit wrote: > text_mutex is expected to be held before text_poke() is called, but we > cannot add a lockdep assertion since kgdb does not take it, and instead > *supposedly* ensures the lock is not taken and will not be acquired by > any other core while text_poke() is running. > > The reason for the "supposedly" comment is that it is not entirely clear > that this would be the case if gdb_do_roundup is zero. > > Add a comment to clarify this behavior, and restore the assertions as > they were before the recent commit. > > This partially reverts commit 9222f606506c ("x86/alternatives: > Lockdep-enforce text_mutex in text_poke*()") Alright, what can we do. It's probably better to have this, rather than to trying to work this around in kgdb to accomodate the rest of the world. > Cc: Jiri Kosina > Cc: Andy Lutomirski > Cc: Kees Cook > Cc: Dave Hansen > Fixes: 9222f606506c ("x86/alternatives: Lockdep-enforce text_mutex in text_poke*()") > Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu > Tested-by: Masami Hiramatsu > Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra > Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit Acked-by: Jiri Kosina Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs