Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266092AbUAFHsE (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 02:48:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266093AbUAFHsE (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 02:48:04 -0500 Received: from [216.239.30.242] ([216.239.30.242]:2058 "EHLO wind.enjellic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266092AbUAFHr5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 02:47:57 -0500 Message-Id: <200401060747.i067lr5S030638@wind.enjellic.com> From: greg@wind.enjellic.com (Dr. Greg Wettstein) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 01:47:53 -0600 In-Reply-To: Philip Dodd "2.4.24 and exec-shield-2.4.23-G4" (Jan 5, 9:36pm) Reply-To: greg@enjellic.com X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: Philip Dodd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.24 and exec-shield-2.4.23-G4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2184 Lines: 58 On Jan 5, 9:36pm, Philip Dodd wrote: } Subject: 2.4.24 and exec-shield-2.4.23-G4 > Hi all, Good evening, hope the day is going well for everyone. > Just a quick query - I rebuilt the kernel on one of the machines here > and I was running the previous 2.4.23 with Ingo's exec-shield patch. I > got the same patch (2.4.23-G4) to apply pretty easily (the mmremap hunk > applied with an offset, only the makefile failed, patched by hand) and > was just wondering if it is reasonable to assume the mmremap patch in > 2.4.24 won't impact the exec-shield patch. The patch in question is > attached here. > > I'm a bit of a neopyhte, but a quick look through the code didn't > suggest that it would have any leathal effect. Am I wrong and will my > PC catch fire overnight because of this? :-D The preliminary indications I have indicate there are problems. I applied the 2.4.23-G4 patch from Ingo with the same results you had, ie the the mmremap offset and Makefile failures. Compiled and rebooted the kernel on a test machine. XFree86 4.3.0 with the RedHat patches now fails to start with a SIG11 error. Turning off exec-shield (echoing 0 to /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield) enables XFree to start normally. So it would seem that something changed with the mremap changes in 2.4.24. > Thanks in advance, > > Phil Have a good day. Greg }-- End of excerpt from Philip Dodd As always, Dr. G.W. Wettstein, Ph.D. Enjellic Systems Development, LLC. 4206 N. 19th Ave. Specializing in information infra-structure Fargo, ND 58102 development. PH: 701-281-1686 FAX: 701-281-3949 EMAIL: greg@enjellic.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "The POP3 server service depends on the SMTP server service, which failed to start because of the following error: The operation completed succesfully." -- Windows NT server v3.51 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/