Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261774AbUAFLbl (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 06:31:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261889AbUAFLbl (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 06:31:41 -0500 Received: from [193.138.115.2] ([193.138.115.2]:45578 "HELO diftmgw.backbone.dif.dk") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261774AbUAFLbh (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 06:31:37 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:28:34 +0100 (CET) From: Jesper Juhl To: Hans Reiser cc: "Tigran A. Aivazian" , Hans Reiser , Daniel Pirkl , Russell King , Will Dyson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nikita@namesys.com Subject: Re: Suspected bug infilesystems (UFS,ADFS,BEFS,BFS,ReiserFS) related to sector_t being unsigned, advice requested In-Reply-To: <3FFA7717.7080808@namesys.com> Message-ID: References: <3FFA7717.7080808@namesys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4006 Lines: 132 On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Hans Reiser wrote: > Jesper Juhl wrote: > > > > > > >The problem is what seems (to me, but I could be dead wrong) to be invalid > >use of variables of type sector_t. > > > > > > > thanks. nikita, please clean. > In case the proper fix is to just get rid of the impossible branches and the unreachable code, I've invluded patches below that does this for the various filesystems. Seems to compile and behave fine (against 2.6.1-rc1-mm2).. --- linux-2.6.1-rc1-mm2-orig/fs/ufs/inode.c 2003-12-31 05:46:41.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.1-rc1-mm2/fs/ufs/inode.c 2004-01-06 12:12:29.000000000 +0100 @@ -331,8 +331,6 @@ static int ufs_getfrag_block (struct ino lock_kernel(); UFSD(("ENTER, ino %lu, fragment %u\n", inode->i_ino, fragment)) - if (fragment < 0) - goto abort_negative; if (fragment > ((UFS_NDADDR + uspi->s_apb + uspi->s_2apb + uspi->s_3apb) << uspi->s_fpbshift)) @@ -393,10 +391,6 @@ abort: unlock_kernel(); return err; -abort_negative: - ufs_warning(sb, "ufs_get_block", "block < 0"); - goto abort; - abort_too_big: ufs_warning(sb, "ufs_get_block", "block > big"); goto abort; --- linux-2.6.1-rc1-mm2-orig/fs/adfs/inode.c 2003-12-31 05:46:54.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.1-rc1-mm2/fs/adfs/inode.c 2004-01-06 12:13:08.000000000 +0100 @@ -27,9 +27,6 @@ int adfs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, struct buffer_head *bh, int create) { - if (block < 0) - goto abort_negative; - if (!create) { if (block >= inode->i_blocks) goto abort_toobig; @@ -42,10 +39,6 @@ adfs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sect /* don't support allocation of blocks yet */ return -EIO; -abort_negative: - adfs_error(inode->i_sb, "block %d < 0", block); - return -EIO; - abort_toobig: return 0; } --- linux-2.6.1-rc1-mm2-orig/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c 2003-12-31 05:47:11.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.1-rc1-mm2/fs/befs/linuxvfs.c 2004-01-06 12:35:27.000000000 +0100 @@ -132,13 +132,6 @@ befs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sect befs_debug(sb, "---> befs_get_block() for inode %lu, block %ld", inode->i_ino, block); - if (block < 0) { - befs_error(sb, "befs_get_block() was asked for a block " - "number less than zero: block %ld in inode %lu", - block, inode->i_ino); - return -EIO; - } - if (create) { befs_error(sb, "befs_get_block() was asked to write to " "block %ld in inode %lu", block, inode->i_ino); --- linux-2.6.1-rc1-mm2-orig/fs/bfs/file.c 2003-12-31 05:46:40.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.1-rc1-mm2/fs/bfs/file.c 2004-01-06 12:15:20.000000000 +0100 @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static int bfs_get_block(struct inode * struct bfs_inode_info *bi = BFS_I(inode); struct buffer_head *sbh = info->si_sbh; - if (block < 0 || block > info->si_blocks) + if (block > info->si_blocks) return -EIO; phys = bi->i_sblock + block; --- linux-2.6.1-rc1-mm2-orig/fs/reiserfs/inode.c 2004-01-06 01:33:08.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.1-rc1-mm2/fs/reiserfs/inode.c 2004-01-06 12:16:16.000000000 +0100 @@ -574,11 +574,6 @@ int reiserfs_get_block (struct inode * i th.t_trans_id = 0 ; version = get_inode_item_key_version (inode); - if (block < 0) { - reiserfs_write_unlock(inode->i_sb); - return -EIO; - } - if (!file_capable (inode, block)) { reiserfs_write_unlock(inode->i_sb); return -EFBIG; Kind regards, Jesper Juhl - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/