Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262041AbUAFMEo (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 07:04:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262050AbUAFMEo (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 07:04:44 -0500 Received: from cibs9.sns.it ([192.167.206.29]:6414 "EHLO cibs9.sns.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262041AbUAFMEi (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 07:04:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:04:24 +0100 (CET) From: venom@sns.it To: "Randy.Dunlap" cc: sglines@is-cs.com, Subject: Re: file system technical comparisons In-Reply-To: <20040105093745.2fc3ffd3.rddunlap@osdl.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2554 Lines: 74 What would be interesting is a new comparison between reiserFS reiser4 and latest XFS. To be onest I think ext3, with or withou HTree, obsolete, but it is abvious if you consider its origins, while I do not speack about JFS, since technically is interesting, but then the bench I did, more than an year ago, were not untisiasmant, and it was buggy when in a DIR there were too many "small" files. Luigi On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 09:37:45 -0800 > From: Randy.Dunlap > To: venom@sns.it > Cc: sglines@is-cs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: file system technical comparisons > > On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:42:32 +0100 (CET) venom@sns.it wrote: > > | > | http://www.linux-mag.com/2002-10/jfs_01.html > | > | On some point it could be discussed, but it is a good starting point. > | > | if you know italian, I will send you another article published in three part > | on Linux&C (http://www.oltrelinux.com) about journaled filesystems available in > | Linux kernel. > | > | bests > | > | Luigi > | > | On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Steve Glines wrote: > | > | > Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:38:22 -0500 > | > From: Steve Glines > | > To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > | > Subject: file system technical comparisons > | > > | > I'm looking for a technical comparison between the major file systems. > | > At a minimum I'd like to see a comparison between ext3, reiserfs, xfs > | > and jfs. In the oh so perfect world I'd like to see detailed info on all > | > supported file systems. > | > > | > Please CC or mail me directly as I am not a subscriber to this list. > | > > | > Thanks > | > -- > | > Steve Glines > > A couple of years ago I did a journaling filesystems comparison > for 2.4.x, so it's quite dated. I wouldn't pay much attention to > the performance numbers from then. > > You can get some other (non-performance) comparison info by looking > at . > > -- > ~Randy > MOTD: Always include version info. > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/