Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp4650imu; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 17:32:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fFUbQ92Syego7+yF9nKibbs30IdIOGKPQnAitM2+97ocwTRsbXWzTkSIxUKvjWgiuyW6hj X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:76c3:: with SMTP id j3-v6mr20378940plt.339.1541381556545; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 17:32:36 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1541381556; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=z4hbAv6ly5mnDdjkrajhVlHUQNKNlZGeioeelb/mQsGrVA+sXUrniuLxBWCuCd39qt 8ggrqiU6OKDda1FNTbtYkmDILa1Uop/zG3jjdmr5gV9V/nxVna25oz9pi9sIxLAu7U3i ezKd4e4fXh8YKPp0C1NtD9wmMuMP5BRzeGyvj5q+gP9iG0zfnyqzhWR5VPapHxN6ibzQ yDXYyz1O5eEd/fj6txKCEFXra6b5FmJJ9og9QrL9G14UiQLgjIo/ZFH2jxwQKXSmRuFV xIvBOKsl+3gqhLIVXvuKJ1xIjQiIzL07b/grsPvmNfmW232nfrOyrwaggfIzdh5VVfjr tsGQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:cc:subject:date:to :from; bh=flEwygAG2iRZQlWW8KcjvJEfejUtM/uL9wrzW3voSdo=; b=S0HU+h7oaadOB7rZKVhqw6gEQRqT2DPTWDfg77oKUEP/56O8A3HHueIdZPihmeI8tB oNBgbldS2j1PzvTUDCnTjMgaR0nDyGiQvH7O0j+ZeILw+20eF+IIdiJsXOLJGL01Dylo phzbeSKlCpZvKcbhE06IP5Otf4CB4XDWDV1RCWYKYT4NNTo6gJ/yClh1j2gCDLjmr3+J CCptUirDZg4U1RezPvsuLFL2U99ozsCk8xlVHe6GKhPVd8xVlu9ZxHFLGXGwevhlNlMJ VjwZsVdnYEPxC8rIvliwGzGgBErGdmhfiBA4RVFf8G9i7YAKUyFuTDR8Gs/lgHkiYAOJ D/vg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a18si4432070pgj.77.2018.11.04.17.32.10; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 17:32:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727217AbeKEKsx (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Nov 2018 05:48:53 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60496 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726494AbeKEKsw (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2018 05:48:52 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay1.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7D0AFDA; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 01:31:44 +0000 (UTC) From: NeilBrown To: Jeff Layton , Alexander Viro Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:30:47 +1100 Subject: [PATCH 01/12] fs/locks: rename some lists and pointers. Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , Martin Wilck , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Frank Filz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <154138144767.31651.11225349164396042986.stgit@noble> In-Reply-To: <154138128401.31651.1381177427603557514.stgit@noble> References: <154138128401.31651.1381177427603557514.stgit@noble> User-Agent: StGit/0.17.1-dirty MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org struct file lock contains an 'fl_next' pointer which is used to point to the lock that this request is blocked waiting for. So rename it to fl_blocker. The fl_blocked list_head in an active lock is the head of a list of blocked requests. In a request it is a node in that list. These are two distinct uses, so replace with two list_heads with different names. fl_blocked is the head of a list of blocked requests fl_block is a node on that list. The two different list_heads are never used at the same time, but that will change in a future patch. Note that a tracepoint is changed to report fl_blocker instead of fl_next. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown --- fs/cifs/file.c | 2 +- fs/locks.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ include/linux/fs.h | 7 +++++-- include/trace/events/filelock.h | 16 ++++++++-------- 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c index 74c33d5fafc8..d7ed895e05d1 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/file.c +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c @@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ cifs_posix_lock_set(struct file *file, struct file_lock *flock) rc = posix_lock_file(file, flock, NULL); up_write(&cinode->lock_sem); if (rc == FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED) { - rc = wait_event_interruptible(flock->fl_wait, !flock->fl_next); + rc = wait_event_interruptible(flock->fl_wait, !flock->fl_blocker); if (!rc) goto try_again; posix_unblock_lock(flock); diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index 2ecb4db8c840..a6c6d601286c 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(blocked_hash, BLOCKED_HASH_BITS); * This lock protects the blocked_hash. Generally, if you're accessing it, you * want to be holding this lock. * - * In addition, it also protects the fl->fl_block list, and the fl->fl_next + * In addition, it also protects the fl->fl_blocked list, and the fl->fl_blocker * pointer for file_lock structures that are acting as lock requests (in * contrast to those that are acting as records of acquired locks). * @@ -293,6 +293,7 @@ static void locks_init_lock_heads(struct file_lock *fl) { INIT_HLIST_NODE(&fl->fl_link); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fl->fl_list); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fl->fl_blocked); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fl->fl_block); init_waitqueue_head(&fl->fl_wait); } @@ -332,6 +333,7 @@ void locks_free_lock(struct file_lock *fl) { BUG_ON(waitqueue_active(&fl->fl_wait)); BUG_ON(!list_empty(&fl->fl_list)); + BUG_ON(!list_empty(&fl->fl_blocked)); BUG_ON(!list_empty(&fl->fl_block)); BUG_ON(!hlist_unhashed(&fl->fl_link)); @@ -667,7 +669,7 @@ static void __locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter) { locks_delete_global_blocked(waiter); list_del_init(&waiter->fl_block); - waiter->fl_next = NULL; + waiter->fl_blocker = NULL; } static void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter) @@ -683,16 +685,16 @@ static void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter) * it seems like the reasonable thing to do. * * Must be called with both the flc_lock and blocked_lock_lock held. The - * fl_block list itself is protected by the blocked_lock_lock, but by ensuring + * fl_blocked list itself is protected by the blocked_lock_lock, but by ensuring * that the flc_lock is also held on insertions we can avoid taking the - * blocked_lock_lock in some cases when we see that the fl_block list is empty. + * blocked_lock_lock in some cases when we see that the fl_blocked list is empty. */ static void __locks_insert_block(struct file_lock *blocker, struct file_lock *waiter) { BUG_ON(!list_empty(&waiter->fl_block)); - waiter->fl_next = blocker; - list_add_tail(&waiter->fl_block, &blocker->fl_block); + waiter->fl_blocker = blocker; + list_add_tail(&waiter->fl_block, &blocker->fl_blocked); if (IS_POSIX(blocker) && !IS_OFDLCK(blocker)) locks_insert_global_blocked(waiter); } @@ -716,18 +718,18 @@ static void locks_wake_up_blocks(struct file_lock *blocker) /* * Avoid taking global lock if list is empty. This is safe since new * blocked requests are only added to the list under the flc_lock, and - * the flc_lock is always held here. Note that removal from the fl_block + * the flc_lock is always held here. Note that removal from the fl_blocked * list does not require the flc_lock, so we must recheck list_empty() * after acquiring the blocked_lock_lock. */ - if (list_empty(&blocker->fl_block)) + if (list_empty(&blocker->fl_blocked)) return; spin_lock(&blocked_lock_lock); - while (!list_empty(&blocker->fl_block)) { + while (!list_empty(&blocker->fl_blocked)) { struct file_lock *waiter; - waiter = list_first_entry(&blocker->fl_block, + waiter = list_first_entry(&blocker->fl_blocked, struct file_lock, fl_block); __locks_delete_block(waiter); if (waiter->fl_lmops && waiter->fl_lmops->lm_notify) @@ -878,7 +880,7 @@ static struct file_lock *what_owner_is_waiting_for(struct file_lock *block_fl) hash_for_each_possible(blocked_hash, fl, fl_link, posix_owner_key(block_fl)) { if (posix_same_owner(fl, block_fl)) - return fl->fl_next; + return fl->fl_blocker; } return NULL; } @@ -1237,7 +1239,7 @@ static int posix_lock_inode_wait(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *fl) error = posix_lock_inode(inode, fl, NULL); if (error != FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED) break; - error = wait_event_interruptible(fl->fl_wait, !fl->fl_next); + error = wait_event_interruptible(fl->fl_wait, !fl->fl_blocker); if (!error) continue; @@ -1324,7 +1326,7 @@ int locks_mandatory_area(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp, loff_t start, error = posix_lock_inode(inode, &fl, NULL); if (error != FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED) break; - error = wait_event_interruptible(fl.fl_wait, !fl.fl_next); + error = wait_event_interruptible(fl.fl_wait, !fl.fl_blocker); if (!error) { /* * If we've been sleeping someone might have @@ -1518,7 +1520,7 @@ int __break_lease(struct inode *inode, unsigned int mode, unsigned int type) locks_dispose_list(&dispose); error = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(new_fl->fl_wait, - !new_fl->fl_next, break_time); + !new_fl->fl_blocker, break_time); percpu_down_read_preempt_disable(&file_rwsem); spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock); @@ -1931,7 +1933,7 @@ static int flock_lock_inode_wait(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *fl) error = flock_lock_inode(inode, fl); if (error != FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED) break; - error = wait_event_interruptible(fl->fl_wait, !fl->fl_next); + error = wait_event_interruptible(fl->fl_wait, !fl->fl_blocker); if (!error) continue; @@ -2210,7 +2212,7 @@ static int do_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, error = vfs_lock_file(filp, cmd, fl, NULL); if (error != FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED) break; - error = wait_event_interruptible(fl->fl_wait, !fl->fl_next); + error = wait_event_interruptible(fl->fl_wait, !fl->fl_blocker); if (!error) continue; @@ -2581,7 +2583,7 @@ posix_unblock_lock(struct file_lock *waiter) int status = 0; spin_lock(&blocked_lock_lock); - if (waiter->fl_next) + if (waiter->fl_blocker) __locks_delete_block(waiter); else status = -ENOENT; @@ -2707,7 +2709,7 @@ static int locks_show(struct seq_file *f, void *v) lock_get_status(f, fl, iter->li_pos, ""); - list_for_each_entry(bfl, &fl->fl_block, fl_block) + list_for_each_entry(bfl, &fl->fl_blocked, fl_block) lock_get_status(f, bfl, iter->li_pos, " ->"); return 0; diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index c95c0807471f..a161bcdca8a2 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -1044,10 +1044,13 @@ bool opens_in_grace(struct net *); * Obviously, the last two criteria only matter for POSIX locks. */ struct file_lock { - struct file_lock *fl_next; /* singly linked list for this inode */ + struct file_lock *fl_blocker; /* The lock, that is blocking us */ struct list_head fl_list; /* link into file_lock_context */ struct hlist_node fl_link; /* node in global lists */ - struct list_head fl_block; /* circular list of blocked processes */ + struct list_head fl_blocked; /* list of requests with + * ->fl_blocker pointing here */ + struct list_head fl_block; /* node in + * ->fl_blocker->fl_blocked */ fl_owner_t fl_owner; unsigned int fl_flags; unsigned char fl_type; diff --git a/include/trace/events/filelock.h b/include/trace/events/filelock.h index 68b17c116907..fad7befa612d 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/filelock.h +++ b/include/trace/events/filelock.h @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(filelock_lock, __field(struct file_lock *, fl) __field(unsigned long, i_ino) __field(dev_t, s_dev) - __field(struct file_lock *, fl_next) + __field(struct file_lock *, fl_blocker) __field(fl_owner_t, fl_owner) __field(unsigned int, fl_pid) __field(unsigned int, fl_flags) @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(filelock_lock, __entry->fl = fl ? fl : NULL; __entry->s_dev = inode->i_sb->s_dev; __entry->i_ino = inode->i_ino; - __entry->fl_next = fl ? fl->fl_next : NULL; + __entry->fl_blocker = fl ? fl->fl_blocker : NULL; __entry->fl_owner = fl ? fl->fl_owner : NULL; __entry->fl_pid = fl ? fl->fl_pid : 0; __entry->fl_flags = fl ? fl->fl_flags : 0; @@ -92,9 +92,9 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(filelock_lock, __entry->ret = ret; ), - TP_printk("fl=0x%p dev=0x%x:0x%x ino=0x%lx fl_next=0x%p fl_owner=0x%p fl_pid=%u fl_flags=%s fl_type=%s fl_start=%lld fl_end=%lld ret=%d", + TP_printk("fl=0x%p dev=0x%x:0x%x ino=0x%lx fl_blocker=0x%p fl_owner=0x%p fl_pid=%u fl_flags=%s fl_type=%s fl_start=%lld fl_end=%lld ret=%d", __entry->fl, MAJOR(__entry->s_dev), MINOR(__entry->s_dev), - __entry->i_ino, __entry->fl_next, __entry->fl_owner, + __entry->i_ino, __entry->fl_blocker, __entry->fl_owner, __entry->fl_pid, show_fl_flags(__entry->fl_flags), show_fl_type(__entry->fl_type), __entry->fl_start, __entry->fl_end, __entry->ret) @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(filelock_lease, __field(struct file_lock *, fl) __field(unsigned long, i_ino) __field(dev_t, s_dev) - __field(struct file_lock *, fl_next) + __field(struct file_lock *, fl_blocker) __field(fl_owner_t, fl_owner) __field(unsigned int, fl_flags) __field(unsigned char, fl_type) @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(filelock_lease, __entry->fl = fl ? fl : NULL; __entry->s_dev = inode->i_sb->s_dev; __entry->i_ino = inode->i_ino; - __entry->fl_next = fl ? fl->fl_next : NULL; + __entry->fl_blocker = fl ? fl->fl_blocker : NULL; __entry->fl_owner = fl ? fl->fl_owner : NULL; __entry->fl_flags = fl ? fl->fl_flags : 0; __entry->fl_type = fl ? fl->fl_type : 0; @@ -145,9 +145,9 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(filelock_lease, __entry->fl_downgrade_time = fl ? fl->fl_downgrade_time : 0; ), - TP_printk("fl=0x%p dev=0x%x:0x%x ino=0x%lx fl_next=0x%p fl_owner=0x%p fl_flags=%s fl_type=%s fl_break_time=%lu fl_downgrade_time=%lu", + TP_printk("fl=0x%p dev=0x%x:0x%x ino=0x%lx fl_blocker=0x%p fl_owner=0x%p fl_flags=%s fl_type=%s fl_break_time=%lu fl_downgrade_time=%lu", __entry->fl, MAJOR(__entry->s_dev), MINOR(__entry->s_dev), - __entry->i_ino, __entry->fl_next, __entry->fl_owner, + __entry->i_ino, __entry->fl_blocker, __entry->fl_owner, show_fl_flags(__entry->fl_flags), show_fl_type(__entry->fl_type), __entry->fl_break_time, __entry->fl_downgrade_time)