Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp137158imu; Sun, 4 Nov 2018 21:00:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cyh95WDCnbjAyksI9pkWk2zV/QHTyHMapyViVqKRhQ6dYx6zFbKOOBES8UWd4f6xtsv1U1 X-Received: by 2002:a65:5a4c:: with SMTP id z12mr6431269pgs.188.1541394026116; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 21:00:26 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1541394026; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=emRZs1TNYOFj3VT9LGBgUigfv1RxFBjgdQjccFa0e0tJP0UDk8vGaFUkFOEE9cv39Y fZyo/lS3mFgxx0kKlbh/c0MJANleegIE3GE4wJMuwAzyOOcQkBSDoz6JDyTiOrybkrZr IZqRueuin49IDwizw1uwm/ifMYbXRvwvjMriWV7oPKX6rEaNGKAYwhNwVPI1xpwH85RU btvDMBd5VdMURWYkMIawsaRvbAJIDVKkBalwbsPhrOmhH1k7QYuFGrSijO6DW/JkQIea wBJN5yEgSjTIh6jHbeOfvKglFofcoTn7cSAQWeIb/jypD4/V6WqRSsznydIslhLl/UiF vUrw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=4CpYAK5J+PSG2WHVK1mTVz1jjzPH+IrbC+znXLttx2U=; b=YfyfdMPn9dcvOp1/ujVkzZ4pRPPh1o+gT6JFvB4NOf/Iy8QIFSH/MWS5dGhjLzBHrH AR8MJJ5d9enm7cftwT2PkvT9N7JeH9zvfiEyhUfsYAiTnuM8T+sBBrkzLBFabhY4xPiy V8s0fNbNh0V2X/GYy5a8012/W1RCnFE2sQ2HyvW86z7zEhfdlIUHKc0/ySyy7unxljPz hSzwUPkl6G57T/Vrlm28cd6KnA7ZlCihKRU1ZVrv0uZfDRiQgtLwhNP8OrNraqOkLALy HOQv6t6SultHAlWcbVIccpez17xNcYvddtA20GIFGOHsQXrDWEYj3Gry9Y66CHtoQM4l 9dOA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=virtuozzo.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b11-v6si9481599plk.406.2018.11.04.20.59.56; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 21:00:26 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=virtuozzo.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728979AbeKEORF (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Nov 2018 09:17:05 -0500 Received: from relay.sw.ru ([185.231.240.75]:37394 "EHLO relay.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728165AbeKEORF (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2018 09:17:05 -0500 Received: from [172.16.24.21] by relay.sw.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gJWyn-0006f6-VF; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 07:59:14 +0300 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: use kvzalloc for swap_info_struct allocation To: "Huang, Ying" Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aaron Lu References: <37b60523-d085-71e9-fef9-80b90bfcef18@virtuozzo.com> <87wopsbb5v.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> From: Vasily Averin Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 07:59:13 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87wopsbb5v.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/5/18 3:50 AM, Huang, Ying wrote: > Vasily Averin writes: > >> commit a2468cc9bfdf ("swap: choose swap device according to numa node") >> increased size of swap_info_struct up to 44 Kbytes, now it requires >> 4th order page. > > Why swap_info_struct could be so large? Because MAX_NUMNODES could be > thousands so that 'avail_lists' field could be tens KB? If so, I think > it's fair to use kvzalloc(). Can you add one line comment? Because > struct swap_info_struct is quite small in default configuration. I was incorrect not 44Kb but 40kb should be here. We have found CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=10 in new RHEL7 update 6 kernel, default ubuntu kernels have the same setting too. crash> struct swap_info_struct -o struct swap_info_struct { [0] unsigned long flags; [8] short prio; ... [140] spinlock_t lock; [144] struct plist_node list; [184] struct plist_node avail_lists[1024]; <<<< here [41144] struct swap_cluster_info *cluster_info; [41152] struct swap_cluster_list free_clusters; ... [41224] spinlock_t cont_lock; } SIZE: 41232 struct swap_info_struct { ... RH_KABI_EXTEND(struct plist_node avail_lists[MAX_NUMNODES]) /* entry in swap_avail_head */ ... } #define MAX_NUMNODES (1 << NODES_SHIFT) #ifdef CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT #define NODES_SHIFT CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT #else #define NODES_SHIFT 0 #endif /boot/config-4.15.0-38-generic:CONFIG_NODES_SHIFT=10