Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264397AbUAFOqO (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:46:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264420AbUAFOqO (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:46:14 -0500 Received: from [212.5.174.154] ([212.5.174.154]:35036 "EHLO zelcom.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264397AbUAFOqM (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:46:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 17:44:47 +0300 Message-ID: <87d69xnnkw.wl@canopus.ns.zel.ru> From: Samium Gromoff To: David Lang Cc: Ed Tomlinson , Samium Gromoff , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0 performance problems In-Reply-To: References: <87brpq7ct3.wl@canopus.ns.zel.ru> <200312300855.00741.edt@aei.ca> <87smiud180.wl@canopus.ns.zel.ru> <200401051009.46293.edt@aei.ca> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2315 Lines: 64 At Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:23:54 -0800 (PST), David Lang wrote: > > On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > > > > On January 05, 2004 07:33 am, Samium Gromoff wrote: > > > At Tue, 30 Dec 2003 08:55:00 -0500, > > > > > > Ed Tomlinson wrote: > > > > On December 30, 2003 06:41 am, Samium Gromoff wrote: > > > > > Reality sucks. > > > > > > > > > > People are ignorant enough to turn blind eye to obvious vm regressions. > > > > > > > > > > No developers run 64M boxens anymore... > > > > > > > > No one is turning a blind eye. Notice Linus has reponded to and is > > > > interested in this thread. The vm is not perfect in all cases - in most > > > > cases it is faster though... > > > > > > "in most cases it is faster" is a big lie. > > > > > > The reality is: on all usual one-way boxes 2.6 goes slower than 2.4 once > > > you start paging. > > > > I would argue that in most case you do not page or page very little - know that is > > the case here. > > > > This may be true of you have lots of memory, but with memory hogs like > mozilla and openoffice out there anyone who is working on an older machine > will be pageing, if only for the time it takes for the huge bloated > desktop app to start and get it's working set into memory. > > things get even worse if you make the mistake of useing Gnome or KDE for > your desktop. I`ve timed delta("exec startx", `last io') with 64M RAM on my box. The desktop consisted of wmaker, several xterms, devhelp (gnome2 app) and several (3-4) wmaker applets, with devhelp being the hoggiest hog. I also hade several services in the background, but they`re mostly irrelevant, due to inactivity. The discovery was that 2.6.0-test9 was about 1.5x slower to reach the `noio' state than 2.4.20-pre9. And no, i don`t use ide on my desktop, so no dma issues there ;-) > David Lang > > -- > "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. > Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, > by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan regards, Samium Gromoff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/