Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264526AbUAFPY1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:24:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264538AbUAFPY0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:24:26 -0500 Received: from faraday.dhtns.com ([64.246.11.56]:45720 "EHLO faraday.dhtns.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264526AbUAFPYY (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:24:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:24:23 -0500 From: Elliott Bennett To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Christophe Saout Subject: Re: JFS resize=0 problem in 2.6.0 Message-ID: <20040106152423.GA27239@faraday.dhtns.com> References: <20031228153028.GB22247@faraday.dhtns.com> <1073082782.28665.16.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1073082782.28665.16.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2111 Lines: 63 On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 11:33:03PM +0100, Christophe Saout wrote: > Am So, den 28.12.2003 schrieb lkml@dhtns.com um 16:30: > > > Let me know if I'm missing the goal of the code here, but lines 261-273 > > of linux-2.6.0/fs/jfs/super.c are: > > > > case Opt_resize: > > { > > char *resize = args[0].from; > > if (!resize || !*resize) { /* LINE 264 HERE */ > > *newLVSize = sb->s_bdev->bd_inode->i_size >> > > sb->s_blocksize_bits; > > if (*newLVSize == 0) > > printk(KERN_ERR > > "JFS: Cannot determine volume size\n"); > > } else > > *newLVSize = simple_strtoull(resize, &resize, 0); > > break; > > } > > > > It seems to me that line 264 is attempting to test for the mount > > paramater "resize=0", and when it comes across this, resize to the full > > size of the volume. However, this doesn't work. I believe it should > > test for the char '0' (*resize=='0'), not against literal zero. > > literal zero is the end of the string. > > So the code checks for resize= and not resize=0. > > I think your fix is wrong because it would also recognize resize=0123 > because it only tests the first character. > > - if (!resize || !*resize) { > + if (!resize || !*resize || *resize=='0') > > It should probably be > > + if (!resize || !*resize || (*resize=='0' && !resize[1])) > > Or better: check the integer value that is returned by simple_strtoull. > > But did you test what resize= does? > > Good catch! I'm embarrassed that I didn't see that. As for "resize=", it seems to fail. Probably because it doesn't match the "resize=%u" pattern: root@tesla:~# mount -o remount,resize= /mnt mount: /mnt not mounted already, or bad option Someone posted a patch the other day that supposedly handles both "resize=0" and "resize" alone..I believe by simply adding it to the pattern list. -Elliott - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/