Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264540AbUAFPbH (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:31:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264542AbUAFPbG (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:31:06 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:11244 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264540AbUAFPbE (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:31:04 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: LVM 2.6 compatibility? Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 16:31:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1073397568.29659.178.camel@roy-sin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bia59lhG59kbuUayw0zBmVskqVw= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 677 Lines: 14 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk writes: > hi all > > I have this archive server running 2.4 and LVM across two 3ware hardware > RAID-5 sets with 8 drives each. Now, upgrading the server, I want a new > logical volume >2TB so I need 2.6. But - one of the logical volumes > would be very nice to keep. Can I upgrade to 2.6 and keep the old LV? Yes. LVM2 understands the LVM1 metadata format. -- M?ns Rullg?rd mru@kth.se - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/