Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To:     Damian Kos <dkos@cadence.com>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
        Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, Sandy Huang <hjc@rock-chips.com>,
        Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= <heiko@sntech.de>,
        Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>,
        Piotr Sroka <piotrs@cadence.com>,
        "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
        Rafal Ciepiela <rafalc@cadence.com>,
        "quentin.schulz@bootlin.com" <quentin.schulz@bootlin.com>,
        "jbergsagel@ti.com" <jbergsagel@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] drm: add support for Cadence MHDP DPI/DP bridge.
Date:   Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:30:05 +0200
Message-ID: <3056496.a8qoricJmv@avalon>
Organization: Ideas on Board Oy
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR0701MB166434BBB71DB76593E0F513CDCA0@CY1PR0701MB1664.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <1539034953-11274-1-git-send-email-dkos@cadence.com> <CY1PR0701MB166434BBB71DB76593E0F513CDCA0@CY1PR0701MB1664.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Damian,

On Monday, 5 November 2018 11:44:53 EET Damian Kos wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> 
> I'm wondering if this time patch is so good that there're no change
> requests, or is it so bad that it was rejected without a comment : )
> Please let me know if this patch is being in review or was rejected and, if
> so, what needs to be changed. 

I unfortunately don't have time to review your series for the time being. 
Hopefully someone else will have a better review bandwidth :-) Sorry about 
that.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart