Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp717105imu; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 07:46:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5ca7Nu8WmNxa6U5Co9p41+pMhMJ8IAjwXXGtch6vB0mSsFcdLBfBQ97XsXiFMjxvnFCcRll X-Received: by 2002:a63:f60c:: with SMTP id m12-v6mr20877152pgh.293.1541432785004; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 07:46:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1541432784; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=KW3dLfizaKdec910zbYOPd25TsuEHbzsKWYc3pb4r43QQqHS2nBv64JhY+2Zzk++il bKuZxgZqp6Ek1fWpQrFhrw4GflFVXI8/9+LBY8PTzHQDZVjaKfGrkq+a6NRv9Fprcbur U/b0gritP0MT8EQ4MCPkDM4BzGxKzGpCZF34MtgXawFUwHkXOdn5BScBPywm0Ywwe4Ys 4OkoebEtxlVZm2fCuQx/32IrbwPNIzVISip9+7XrFGxYhPtK8TgQ6hISKRPomw/t4EZt AvTIS8O9OQA8vw2C9jQd1bOOynmtgpvysCL8/POZMY6m4KLxJareaHQ+9zfcrISSmLo/ PuSQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:user-agent:references :message-id:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=Rre7NqklEkiM9tj2XYN5S53v7PnmNsOgfGc85d3Ll2I=; b=iqn/uOiOI0u7VcMif7M94urkmKOg1MwPXqVrD5JEgKnzE0X4FOPhcVypR3DLoQz77n 6idEBLFnWPy5ZYT/8aphGGqRystVpS/kQ76lTfGsWFF5GvVJLwl0FLoTcFY+wViW2a17 wdHI6V0RaZQCeyi4vIfhLtxoOKbHtJGoN6iAKTUuptQK0lqIWnwpit4FGr14Xu9N6TpG 3n0EyJYydScZ0WYEzHf7zvTLNMJirH9qbKc8gIdWc3GQ7NMhWnZnHn4AigF6IFgZdKNr 6Z5dKEMiDAo+UUWdPtCX2pl5QlcgXUajxc336BLN7Jc80HxVZMwkwXhoW/Uf9TwOs0vK KY5w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i66-v6si44521475pfc.173.2018.11.05.07.46.09; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 07:46:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387502AbeKFBFB (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 5 Nov 2018 20:05:01 -0500 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:35315 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729019AbeKFBFB (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2018 20:05:01 -0500 Received: from hsi-kbw-5-158-153-52.hsi19.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de ([5.158.153.52] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1gJh37-0000JQ-5k; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 16:44:21 +0100 Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:44:20 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Ingo Molnar cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shai@scalemp.com, jgross@suse.com, eial@scalemp.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/vsmp: Remove dependency on pv_irq_ops In-Reply-To: <20181105154139.GA124398@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <1541404864-31603-1-git-send-email-eial@scalemp.com> <20181105154139.GA124398@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 5 Nov 2018, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * tip-bot for Eial Czerwacki wrote: > > > Commit-ID: 7f2d7f8190d856949d8aaab55d3902cd10ea1048 > > Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/7f2d7f8190d856949d8aaab55d3902cd10ea1048 > > Author: Eial Czerwacki > > AuthorDate: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 10:01:04 +0200 > > Committer: Thomas Gleixner > > CommitDate: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 12:33:47 +0100 > > > > x86/vsmp: Remove dependency on pv_irq_ops > > > > vsmp dependency on pv_irq_ops has been removed some years ago, but the code > > still deals with pv_irq_ops. > > s/vsmp > /vSMP > > > +#if defined CONFIG_PCI > > I don't think code was ever tested with PCI disabled? > > The above typoed sequence of code accidentally evaluates to 'true' > regardless of CONFIG_PCI. Grr. Indeed, missed that