Received: by 2002:ad5:474a:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i10csp1064685imu; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 13:14:00 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5eDPnxJQ/WipSJWe06K/lE/aJvN/MiVnrRIOSA3ZiRJR2ubKEb7+jLnLozRGIewWkqQgFiY X-Received: by 2002:a63:e445:: with SMTP id i5mr18754527pgk.307.1541452440120; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:14:00 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1541452440; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ASRv/8C0aQWAx0R41ccjT/bjoI4sLVN32h+vO47Bt1g0omxvW9A4HVwJteS2knKXT8 sHRCeD63M8JNZwd3uIfPIoWygdd0XcBdu9hK/vokhgtYFHc8oWGCNopu1fUbZf3kz2sP 1ETCcPoO/CN6VQOSKmrodooBfLFLtb2ZEa9/mryHec09h3esLrOnC1x1SmPaXQxhh2bk lBqrIH082URpU4jAQYvE0NpN6hWNAZ1MJmIzdqGVUA5vg7drIFGnWIo7UsgD0EjvTPXA NGysyr4O3Yh61ffltKbY6+hmRZj1qH+3lblFz1vM1bRijrpAAzuytaKlrXOQmVA4hDm1 eqBA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=AZChSWf/hN+H35Ao1p18uP5kAim2kZrqITsnSQWFI+s=; b=TuKzBTeSPxdUE2K0UkR5SKZzOJlDOJTIjkh0csUivICVKAbSnC7v2NBlW80DaZ5njh RqwEhpsZngQGhitTKSvY22NZKcBPJmVFKUyQkYBnAhw3fbE/Bmnom983MFJTtznPKTxt rk93tSEUnXtw7n2PzwtLIwXU20QgUsSkW0OP+glJGtcPo8L0sV/F0m8EfM21FOuKGOQt QKzDVL4ObRGZ8ZZCpCpObnpXPs14oJh42DRyNxWKCjgeMA3K3KPvxXKFGbn5h/bwREDp F2QpenWtgrXj0n8FVWVVvBfokOaKbXgJPQec/6e47uBnrT85uS4CniTJni8NGfrWesb3 It6w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f32-v6si41827903pgm.505.2018.11.05.13.13.45; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 13:14:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387845AbeKFGen (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 6 Nov 2018 01:34:43 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:39402 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387441AbeKFGem (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Nov 2018 01:34:42 -0500 Received: from akpm3.svl.corp.google.com (unknown [104.133.8.65]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C284C5A8; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 21:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 13:13:05 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Bart Van Assche Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka , Mel Gorman , Christoph Lameter , Roman Gushchin , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab.h: Avoid using & for logical and of booleans Message-Id: <20181105131305.574d85469f08a4b76592feb6@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20181105204000.129023-1-bvanassche@acm.org> References: <20181105204000.129023-1-bvanassche@acm.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.6.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 12:40:00 -0800 Bart Van Assche wrote: > This patch suppresses the following sparse warning: > > ./include/linux/slab.h:332:43: warning: dubious: x & !y > > ... > > --- a/include/linux/slab.h > +++ b/include/linux/slab.h > @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static __always_inline enum kmalloc_cache_type kmalloc_type(gfp_t flags) > * If an allocation is both __GFP_DMA and __GFP_RECLAIMABLE, return > * KMALLOC_DMA and effectively ignore __GFP_RECLAIMABLE > */ > - return type_dma + (is_reclaimable & !is_dma) * KMALLOC_RECLAIM; > + return type_dma + is_reclaimable * !is_dma * KMALLOC_RECLAIM; > } > > /* I suppose so. That function seems too clever for its own good :(. I wonder if these branch-avoiding tricks are really worthwhile.