Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 5 Nov 2018 23:13:49 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc:     Vitaly Mayatskih <v.mayatskih@gmail.com>,
        "Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] vhost: add vhost_blk driver
Message-ID: <20181106071349.GA5526@infradead.org>
References: <20181102182123.29420-1-v.mayatskih@gmail.com>
 <6a7f1668-bf2d-0caa-2efd-c8fab5f1db24@redhat.com>
 <CAGF4SLg6+nt+zV4haXys4Wz2dWPDyx7xHXuA+h01NcQ94j0E1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <57eefa62-7e66-786d-441c-5dd6b0d451a5@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <57eefa62-7e66-786d-441c-5dd6b0d451a5@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 10:45:08AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > Storage industry is shifting away from SCSI, which has a scaling
> > problem.
> 
> 
> Know little about storage. For scaling, do you mean SCSI protocol itself? If
> not, it's probably not a real issue for virtio-scsi itself.

The above is utter bullshit.  There is a big NVMe hype, but it is not
because "SCSI has a scaling problem", but because the industry can sell
a new thing, and the standardization body seems easier to work with.