Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20180928225044.20132-1-robh@kernel.org> <20181001081659.GW11082@phenom.ffwll.local>
In-Reply-To: <20181001081659.GW11082@phenom.ffwll.local>
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 6 Nov 2018 15:57:16 -0600
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJaoXd5xhhi1kvLHrRiMh1BTbnQ=p8Oz9893uVMJ1UpEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
To:     Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        freedreno <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 3:17 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 05:50:44PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node,
> > convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier.
> >
> > For drm_modes.c, the full node path is already printed out, so printing
> > just the node name a 2nd time is redundant and can be removed.
> >
> > Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@padovan.org>
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
> > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
> > Acked-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
> > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > - Add to commit msg that we're dropping redundant printing of node name.
>
> Applied, thanks for the patch.

It appears this hasn't been.

> Aside, still don't want drm-misc commit rights so you can offload these
> yourself?

No thanks.

Rob