Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:28:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:28:02 -0500 Received: from ma-northadams1-47.nad.adelphia.net ([24.51.236.47]:44807 "EHLO sparrow.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:27:51 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 01:27:09 -0500 From: Eric Buddington To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: 386 'ls' gets SIGILL iff /proc is mounted Message-ID: <20010327012709.I59@sparrow.nad.adelphia.net> Reply-To: ebuddington@wesleyan.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Organization: ECS Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: there is no conspiracy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2.4.2-ac23 nfsroot on a 386SX/20 with 6Mb RAM On boot to single user, 'ls' and 'ls -l' work fine. After mounting /proc, 'ls' still works, but 'ls -l' fails with SIGILL after reading /etc/timezone (so says strace). Unmounting /proc fixes the problem. Unmounting /dev doesn't. I also, just now, had a spate of 'permission denied' errors while trying to ls /dev/ subdirectories, and unexpected stale NFS handles. The problems are varied enough that I suspect bad hardware, but would flaky RAM cause such similar failures repeatedly? And is there a way to test RAM explicitly? Any tips appreciated, either to me (ebuddington@wesleyan.edu) or to the list. -Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/